Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Rita Kukafka

Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

Articles (4)

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Significant underutilization of breast cancer chemoprevention remains, despite guidelines stating that physicians should recommend chemoprevention with antiestrogen therapy to high-risk women. We randomized women, ages 35 to 75 years, who met high-risk criteria for breast cancer, without a personal history of breast cancer or prior chemoprevention use, to standard educational materials alone or combined with a web-based decision aid. All healthcare providers, including primary care providers and breast specialists, were given access to a web-based decision support tool. The primary endpoint was chemoprevention uptake at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included decision antecedents (perceived breast cancer risk/worry, chemoprevention knowledge, self-efficacy) and decision quality (decision conflict, chemoprevention informed choice) based upon patient surveys administered at baseline, 1 and 6 months after randomization. Among 282 evaluable high-risk women enrolled from November 2016 to March 2020, mean age was 57 years (SD, 9.9) and mean 5-year invasive breast cancer risk was 2.98% (SD, 1.42). There was no significant difference in chemoprevention uptake at 6 months between the intervention and control groups (2.1% vs. 3.5%). Comparing the intervention and control arms at 1 month, there were significant differences among high-risk women in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (56% vs. 39%, P = 0.017), adequate chemoprevention knowledge (49% vs. 27%, P < 0.001), mean decision conflict (34.0 vs. 47.0, P < 0.001), and informed choice (41% vs. 23%, P = 0.003). These differences were no longer significant at 6 months. Although our decision support tools did not result in a significant increase in chemoprevention uptake, we did observe improvements in decision antecedents and decision quality measures. Prevention Relevance: In this randomized controlled trial of decision support for 300 high-risk women and 50 healthcare providers, we did not observe a significant increase in chemoprevention uptake, which remained low at under 5%. However, these decision support tools may increase knowledge and informed choice about breast cancer chemoprevention.

Year:

2022

Collaborators (7)

Patricia Davidson

Professor

West Chester University

UNITED STATES
View details

Ting He

Columbia University

UNITED STATES
View details

Lena Mamykina

Associate Professor

Columbia University

UNITED STATES
View details

Jonathan Tobin

Senior Epidemiologist, Adjunct Professor & Co-Director, Community-Engaged Research

Rockefeller University

UNITED STATES
View details

Katherine Crew

Professor

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

UNITED STATES
View details

Haomiao Jia

Professor

Columbia University

UNITED STATES
View details

Elizabeth Heitkemper

University of Texas at Austin

UNITED STATES
View details