Sabine Ruf

This study aimed to investigate the transfer accuracy and required time for digital full-arch impressions obtained from intraoral scanners (IOSs) versus conventional alginate impressions (CAIs) in patients with multibracket appliances (MBA). Thirty patients with buccal MBAs (metal brackets, archwire removed) were examined using an established reference aid method. Impression-taking using four IOSs (Primescan, Trios 4, Medit i700, Emerald S) and one CAI with subsequent plaster casting were conducted. One-hundred-twenty (n = 30 × 4) scans were analyzed with 3D software (GOM Inspect) and 30 (n = 30 × 1) casts were assessed using a coordinate measurement machine. Six distances and six angles were measured and compared to the reference aid values (ANOVA; p < 0.05). Except for the intermolar distance, transfer accuracy was significantly higher with IOSs than with CAIs (p < 0.05). No such difference was found regarding the six angles. In patients with MBAs, digital impression-taking using IOSs can be recommended. For all measured variables except one, the transfer accuracy of IOSs was better than or at least equivalent to the data from CAIs. In addition, significantly (p < 0.001) less time was necessary for all IOSs in comparison to CAIs plus plaster casting.

Orthodontic tooth movement is a complex periodontal remodeling process triggered by compression that involves sterile inflammation and immune responses. Macrophages are mechanically sensitive immune cells, but their role in orthodontic tooth movement is unclear. Here, we hypothesize that orthodontic force can activate macrophages, and their activation may be associated with orthodontic root resorption. After force-loading and/or adiponectin application, the migration function of macrophages was tested via scratch assay, and Nos2, Il1b, Arg1, Il10, ApoE, and Saa3 expression levels were detected using qRT-PCR. Furthermore, H3 histone acetylation was measured using an acetylation detection kit. The specific inhibitor of H3 histone, I-BET762, was deployed to observe its effect on macrophages. In addition, cementoblasts were treated with macrophage-conditioned medium or compression force, and OPG production and cellular migration were measured. We further detected Piezo1 expression in cementoblasts via qRT-PCR and Western-blot, and its effect on the force-induced impairment of cementoblastic functions was also analyzed. Compressive force significantly inhibited macrophage migration. Nos2 was up-regulated 6 h after force-loading. Il1b, Arg1, Il10, Saa3, and ApoE increased after 24 h. Meanwhile, higher H3 histone acetylation was detected in the macrophages subjected to compression, and I-BET762 dampened the expression of M2 polarization markers (Arg1 and Il10). Lastly, even though the activated macrophage-conditioned medium showed no effect on cementoblasts, compressive force directly impaired cementoblastic function by enhancing mechanoreceptor Piezo1. Compressive force activates macrophages; specifically, it causes M2 polarization via H3 histone acetylation in the late stage. Compression-induced orthodontic root resorption is macrophage-independent, but it involves the activation of mechanoreceptor Piezo1.