Saqib Anwar

College of Engineering
Country flagSaudi Arabia

Research Interests

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (11)

The surface roughness (Ra) of indirect computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated dental restorations is crucial for their long-term durability. This study intended to evaluate the Ra of five different types of contemporary indirect CAD/CAM restorative materials with varying compositions that were glazed and finished/polished. A total of 75 specimens, disc-shaped (10 mm × 2 mm), were obtained from five materials (n = 15) (Tetric CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max ZirCAD, CELTRA Duo, and Vita Enamic) and fabricated by CAD/CAM. One of the two surfaces for each specimen was subjected to glazing, while the other surface was subjected to finishing/polishing. The Ra of the two surfaces in micrometers (μm) was evaluated using a Profilometer, while the surface topography was examined using a scanning electron microscope. Using SPSS, the Kruskal–Wallis, post hoc Conover, and Mann–Whitney tests were used to statistically evaluate the data. A comparison of the Ra for the finished/polished surfaces of the five test materials showed significant differences (p < 0.0001). Among the finished/polished surfaces, the mean rank values of Vita Enamic were significantly higher than the other four test materials (p < 0.0001). A comparison of the Ra of glazed surfaces among the five study materials revealed significant differences (p < 0.0001). The Ra for the IPS e.max ZirCAD material was significantly higher than the rest of the four materials (p < 0.001). A comparison of the Ra for two types of surface conditioning within each of the five test materials showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Only for IPS e.max ZirCAD was the Ra of the glazed surface significantly higher than the finished/polished surface (p < 0.0001). Significant variations in the surface roughness (Ra) were exhibited between the finished/polished and glazed surfaces of the five test materials. Hybrid ceramics showed the highest Ra values for the finished/polished surfaces, and zirconia exhibited the highest Ra values among the glazed surfaces among the tested materials. The Ra values of either finished/polished or glazed surfaces of the test materials were within the clinically acceptable range (0.2–0.5 μm), except for the glazed surface of the zirconia ceramics (0.84 μm).

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Due to its near-net-shape manufacturing and ability to treat challenging-to-manufacture materials such as titanium alloys, Additive manufacturing (AM) is growing in popularity. However, due to the poor surface quality of AM components, finishing processes such as machining are required. One of the most difficult aspects of finishing AM components is the fact that even when using the same machining parameters, the surface roughness can vary significantly depending on the orientation of the part. In this study, electron beam melting (EBM) Ti6Al4V parts are subjected to the finishing (milling) process in three potential orientations relative to the direction of the tool feed. The impact of the feed rate, radial depth of cut, and cutting speed on the surface roughness and cutting force of the Ti6Al4V EBM part is studied while taking the orientations of the EBM components into consideration. It is found that the machined surface changes in noticeable ways with respect to orientation. A factorial design is used for the experiments, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to evaluate the results. Furthermore, the grey relational analysis (GRA) method coupled with entropy weights is utilized to determine the optimal process variables for machining a Ti6Al4V EBM component. The results show that the feed rate has the greatest impact on the multi-response optimization, followed by the cutting speed, faces, and radial depth of cut.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (10)

Emad Hashiem Abualsauod

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Mohammed H. Alhaag

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Khaled N. Alqahtani

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Husam Kaid

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Waqar Muhammad Ashraf

University College London

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari

-

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Jaroslaw Krzywanski

Jan Długosz University

POLAND
View details

Rodolfo Haber

-

SPAIN
View details

Abdullah Yahia AlFaify

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details

Mustafa M. Nasr

College of Engineering

SAUDI ARABIA
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.