Sara Schroter

Has grant

Honorary Lecturer

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

United Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Professors in United Kingdom

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

About

Dr. Sara Schroter is an Honorary Lecturer at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in the UK. Her research focuses on public health, with recent articles addressing issues such as retraction notices, biases in editorial decision-making in biomedical journals, and the impact of climate change on health. She also explores methodological challenges in systematic reviews and peer review processes in academic publishing.

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Characterisation of trials designed primarily for marketing purposes rather than addressing a genuine clinical need: a descriptive study

Open Date: 2012-01-01

Close Date: 2014-01-01

Grant: Close

Authors’ awareness of publication ethics: An international survey

Open Date: 2009-01-01

Close Date: 2011-01-01

Grant: Close

Development and validation of a patient-based measure of outcome for coronary revascularisation

Open Date: 1997-01-01

Close Date: 2000-01-01

Grant: Close

MSc in Public Health

Open Date: 1996-01-01

Close Date: 1997-01-01

Articles (12)

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (3)

Angèle Gayet-Ageron

Assistant professor

University of Geneva

SWITZERLAND

View details

Melissa Rethlefsen

University of New Mexico

UNITED STATES

View details

Amanda Adams

Cooper Medical School of Rowan University

UNITED STATES

View details

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Sara Schroter

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

About

Recent Grants

Articles (12)

Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health

Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study

Gender and geographical bias in the editorial decision-making process of biomedical journals: a case-control study

The BMJ will remunerate patient and public reviewers

Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic

Health journal coverage of climate change and health: a bibliometric study

Systematic review search strategies are poorly described and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study

Guidance needed: where should randomized studies which do not assess a health outcome be registered?

One female perspective on diversity in peer review Reply

Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials

Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

Evaluation of editors’ abilities to predict the citation potential of research manuscripts submitted to The BMJ : a cohort study

Collaborators (3)

Angèle Gayet-Ageron

Melissa Rethlefsen

Amanda Adams

Make your next move.