Stefan Schaub

University Hospital Basel
Country flagSwitzerland

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (11)

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Significance Statement This study is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical utility of a noninvasive monitoring biomarker in renal transplantation. Although urine CXCL10 monitoring could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on 1-year outcomes, the study is a rich source for future design of trials aiming to explore the clinical utility of noninvasive biomarkers. In addition, the study supports the use of urine CXCL10 to assess the inflammatory status of the renal allograft. Background Urine CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detection of renal allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of renal allograft monitoring by urine CXCL10 in a randomized trial. Methods We stratified 241 patients, 120 into an intervention and 121 into a control arm. In both arms, urine CXCL10 levels were monitored at three specific time points (1, 3, and 6 months post-transplant). In the intervention arm, elevated values triggered performance of an allograft biopsy with therapeutic adaptations according to the result. In the control arm, urine CXCL10 was measured, but the results concealed. The primary outcome was a combined end point at 1-year post-transplant (death-censored graft loss, clinical rejection between month 1 and 1-year, acute rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, chronic active T-cell–mediated rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies, or eGFR <25 ml/min). Results The incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the intervention and the control arm (51% versus 49%; relative risk (RR), 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.34]; P = 0.80). When including 175 of 241 (73%) patients in a per-protocol analysis, the incidence of the primary outcome was also not different (55% versus 49%; RR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.47]; P = 0.54). The incidence of the individual end points was not different as well. Conclusions This study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of urine CXCL10 monitoring on 1-year outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov_NCT03140514).

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (10)

Helmut Hopfer

University Hospital Basel

SWITZERLAND
View details

Dionysios Neofytos

University Hospital of Geneva

SWITZERLAND
View details

Hans H. Hirsch

-

SWITZERLAND
View details

Déla Golshayan

Associate Professor

University of Lausanne

SWITZERLAND
View details

Vanessa Banz

-

SWITZERLAND
View details

Carsten T. Herz

Medical University of Vienna

AUSTRIA
View details

Hannes Vietzen

Medical University of Vienna

AUSTRIA
View details

Marc Froissart

Full Professor, Head Physician

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

SWITZERLAND
View details

Nicolas Goossens

Chargé de Cours, Lecturer

University of Geneva

SWITZERLAND
View details

Matthias Diebold

University Hospital Basel

SWITZERLAND
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.