Stefan Schaub
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (11)
Year:
2025
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Significance Statement This study is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical utility of a noninvasive monitoring biomarker in renal transplantation. Although urine CXCL10 monitoring could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on 1-year outcomes, the study is a rich source for future design of trials aiming to explore the clinical utility of noninvasive biomarkers. In addition, the study supports the use of urine CXCL10 to assess the inflammatory status of the renal allograft. Background Urine CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detection of renal allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of renal allograft monitoring by urine CXCL10 in a randomized trial. Methods We stratified 241 patients, 120 into an intervention and 121 into a control arm. In both arms, urine CXCL10 levels were monitored at three specific time points (1, 3, and 6 months post-transplant). In the intervention arm, elevated values triggered performance of an allograft biopsy with therapeutic adaptations according to the result. In the control arm, urine CXCL10 was measured, but the results concealed. The primary outcome was a combined end point at 1-year post-transplant (death-censored graft loss, clinical rejection between month 1 and 1-year, acute rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, chronic active T-cell–mediated rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies, or eGFR <25 ml/min). Results The incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the intervention and the control arm (51% versus 49%; relative risk (RR), 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.34]; P = 0.80). When including 175 of 241 (73%) patients in a per-protocol analysis, the incidence of the primary outcome was also not different (55% versus 49%; RR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.47]; P = 0.54). The incidence of the individual end points was not different as well. Conclusions This study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of urine CXCL10 monitoring on 1-year outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov_NCT03140514).
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Collaborators (10)
Helmut Hopfer
University Hospital Basel
Dionysios Neofytos
University Hospital of Geneva
Hans H. Hirsch
-
Déla Golshayan
Associate Professor
University of Lausanne
Vanessa Banz
-
Carsten T. Herz
Medical University of Vienna
Hannes Vietzen
Medical University of Vienna
Marc Froissart
Full Professor, Head Physician
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Nicolas Goossens
Chargé de Cours, Lecturer
University of Geneva
Matthias Diebold
University Hospital Basel
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.