Tianze Liu
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (7)
Alaska is a tectonically active region with a long history of subduction and terrane accretion, but knowledge of its deep seismic structure is limited by a relatively sparse station distribution. By combining data from the EarthScope Transportable Array and other regional seismic networks, we obtain a high‐resolution state‐wide map of the Moho and upper‐mantle discontinuities beneath Alaska using teleseismic SH‐wave reverberations. Crustal thickness is generally correlated with elevation and the deepest Moho is in the region with basal accretion of the subducted Yakutat plate, consistent with its higher density due to a more mafic composition. The crustal thickness in the Brooks Range agrees with the prediction based on Airy isostasy and the weak free‐air gravity anomaly, suggesting that this region probably does not have significant density anomalies. We also resolve the 410, 520, and 660 discontinuities in most regions, with a thickened mantle transition zone (MTZ) and a normal depth difference between the 520 and 660 discontinuities (d660‐d520) under central Alaska, indicating the presence of the subducted Pacific slab in the upper MTZ. A near‐normal MTZ and a significantly smaller d660‐d520 are resolved under southeastern Alaska, suggesting potential mantle upwelling in the lower MTZ. Beneath the Alaska Peninsula, the thinned MTZ implies that the Pacific slab may not have reached the MTZ in this region, which is also consistent with recent tomography models. Overall, the results demonstrate a bent or segmented Pacific slab with varying depths under central Alaska and the Alaska Peninsula.
Year:
2023
Ocean transform faults often generate characteristic earthquakes that repeatedly rupture the same fault patches. The westernmost Gofar transform fault quasi‐periodically hosts ∼ M 6 earthquakes every ∼5 years, and microseismicity suggests that the fault is segmented into five distinct zones, including a rupture barrier zone that may have modulated the rupture of adjacent M 6 earthquakes. However, the relationship between the systematic slip behavior of the Gofar fault and the fault material properties is still poorly known. Specifically, the role of pore fluids in regulating the slip of the Gofar fault is unclear. Here, we use differential travel times between nearby earthquakes to estimate the in‐situ V p / V s of the fault‐zone materials. We apply this technique to the dataset collected by an ocean‐bottom‐seismometer network deployed around the Gofar fault in 2008, which recorded abundant microearthquakes, and find a moderate V p / V s of 1.75–1.80 in the rupture barrier zone and a low V p / V s of 1.61–1.69 in the down‐dip edge of the 2008 M 6 rupture zone. This lateral variation in V p / V s may be caused by both pore fluids and chemical alteration. We also find a 5%–10% increase in V p / V s in the barrier zone during the 9 months before the mainshock. This increase may have been caused by fluid migrations or slip transients in the barrier zone.
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (4)
Laura Crossey
Distinguished Professor
University of New Mexico
Karl Karlstrom
Distinguished Professor
University of New Mexico
Simon Klemperer
Professor
Stanford University
Guoqing Lin
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.