Yong In

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and polyethylene (PE) insert thickness between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems providing 1 mm and 2 mm increments. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 50 patients (100 knees) undergoing same-day or staggered bilateral TKA were randomized to receive a TKA system providing 1 mm increments in one knee (1 mm group) and a TKA system providing 2 mm increments in the other knee (2 mm group). At 2 years postoperatively, Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), range of motion (ROM), and insert thicknesses were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 47 patients (94 knees) participated in follow-up analysis. In each group, patient-reported outcomes improved significantly after TKA (all, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes. The mean ROM was not significantly different between groups at preoperative and 2-year points. The rate of postoperative flexion contracture ≥ 5° was 2.1% and 4.3%, and the rate of postoperative recurvatum ≥ 5° was 4.3% and 2.1% in the 1 mm group and 2 mm, respectively (all, p = 1.000). Mean insert thickness was significantly thinner in the 1 mm group than the 2 mm group (p = 0.001). The usage rate of a thick insert (≥14 mm) was 12.7% and 38.3% in the 1 mm group and 2 mm group (p = 0.005). Conclusions: The use of a TKA system providing 1 mm PE insert thickness increments offered no clinical benefit in terms of patient reported outcomes over systems with 2 mm increments at 2 years of follow-up. However, the TKA system with 1 mm increments showed significantly thinner PE insert usage. As a theoretical advantage of 1 mm increments has yet to be proven, the mid- to long-term effects of thinner PE insert usage must be determined.

(1) Background: A cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a recent and an increasingly popular innovation that enhances porous fixation surfaces. However, the lack of cemented sealing of an exposed resected bone has raised concerns about the potential for greater blood loss. The goals of this study were to determine if a cementless approach impacts post-TKA hemodynamics and to identify risk factors for blood loss in instances of cementless (vs. cemented) TKAs under a contemporary patient blood management (PBM) protocol. (2) Methods: We recruited 153 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral TKAs between 2019 and 2023. All enrollees received cementless or cemented prostheses of the same design (cementless, 87; cemented, 66). After propensity score matching for demographics, there were 46 patients in each group. We then compared blood loss metrics (total [TBL] and estimated [EBL]), drainage volumes, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and transfusion rates by group. (3) Results: Post-TKA hemodynamics (i.e., TBL, EBL, drainage, Hb level, and transfusion rate) of cementless (n = 46) and cemented (n = 46) TKA groups did not differ significantly. In addition, the proportions of patients with Hb drops > 3.0 g/dL were similar for the two groups. A logistic regression analysis revealed that only preoperative Hb and EBL during the early postoperative period were predictive of a substantial fall in Hb levels. The fixation method was not associated with Hb decline > 3.0 g/dL by postoperative Day 3. (4) Conclusion: The cementless TKA has no impact on customary post-TKA hemodynamics and is not associated with greater TKA-related blood loss when implementing a contemporary PBM protocol.