Your Twin learns with you

30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro

Ends in00h00m00s

Arno Nordin

Head of the unit

Helsinki University Hospital
Country flagFinland

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Articles (9)

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Background: Biliary dysplasia, a precursor of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), is a common complication of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or early CCA who have received oncological treatment are candidates for liver transplantation. The preoperative diagnosis of CCA or HGD is challenging, and the sensitivity of biliary brush cytology (BC) is limited. Methods: By using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we retrospectively analyzed archived tissue samples (n=62) obtained from explanted liver tissue and CCA samples to identify oncogenic mutations that occur during primary sclerosing cholangitis carcinogenesis. BC samples were prospectively collected from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=97) referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography to measure the diagnostic utility of NGS combined with BC compared with traditional cytology alone. Results: Mutations in KRAS , GNAS , FLT3, RNF43 , TP53 , ATRX , and SMAD4 were detected in archived CCA or HGD samples. KRAS , GNAS , TP53 , CDKN2A , FBXW7 , BRAF , and ATM mutations were detected in prospectively collected brush samples from patients with histologically verified CCA or HGD. One patient with low-grade dysplasia in the explanted liver had KRAS and GNAS mutations in brush sample. No mutations were observed in brush samples or archived tissues in liver transplantation cases without biliary neoplasia. While KRAS mutations are common in biliary neoplasms, they were also observed in patients without biliary neoplasia during surveillance. Conclusions: In summary, NGS of BC samples increased the sensitivity of detecting biliary neoplasia compared with traditional cytology. Performing NGS on BC samples may help diagnose HGD or early CCA, benefiting the timing of liver transplantation.

Year:

2024

Background The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes. Methods All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long‐term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings. Results In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death‐censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572–.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696). Conclusions Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long‐term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (16)

Fernanda Ortiz

Chief of the outpatient clinic

Helsinki University Hospital

FINLAND
View details

Fredrik O. Åberg

Helsinki University Hospital

FINLAND
View details

Marko Lempinen

-

FINLAND
View details

Martti Färkkilä

University of Helsinki

FINLAND
View details

Helle Bruunsgaard

-

DENMARK
View details

Jouni Lauronen

Chief Physician of the Department

-

FINLAND
View details

Emerik Osterlund

Uppsala Universitet Farmaceutiska fakulteten

SWEDEN
View details

Andreas Schult

Skåne University Hospital

SWEDEN
View details

Johanna Arola

Helsinki University Hospital

FINLAND
View details

Akseli Bonsdorff

University of Helsinki

FINLAND
View details

Ilkka Helanterä

University of Helsinki

FINLAND
View details

Ville J Sallinen

University of Helsinki

FINLAND
View details

Pia Osterlund

Karolinska University Hospital

SWEDEN
View details

Teijo Kuopio

-

FINLAND
View details

Carl Jorns

Karolinska Institutet

SWEDEN
View details

Jukka Partanen

Research Director, Professor

University of Helsinki

FINLAND
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.