Martti Färkkilä
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (26)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes. Methods All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long‐term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings. Results In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death‐censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572–.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696). Conclusions Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long‐term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Collaborators (26)
Natalie Prescott
King’s College London
Nelli T Sjöblom
University of Helsinki
Annika Bergquist
Karolinska University Hospital
Xavier Verhelst
Associate Professor of Hepatology
Ghent University
Veikko Salomaa
Research Professor
National Institute for Health and Welfare
Fredrik O. Åberg
-
Ruth Loos
Københavns Universitet
Nina Mars
University of Helsinki
Tiinamaija Tuomi
University of Helsinki
Sami Qadri
University of Helsinki
Ewa Wunsch
Pomeranian Medical University
Hannele Laivuori
University of Tampere
A Palomäki
Helsinki University Hospital
Tobias J. Weismüller
Head of Department
-
Elizabeth Atkinson
Assistant Professor
Baylor College of Medicine
Peter Irving
King’s College London
Magnus Holmer
Karolinska University Hospital
Michael Talkowski
Professor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Cynthia Levy
Professor of Medicine
University of Miami
Tiina Vesterinen
University of Helsinki
Christoph Schramm
Professor
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Christine Stevens
Broad Institute
Aldo J. Montano-Loza
University of Alberta Hospital
Teijo Kuopio
-
Jukka Koskela
University of Helsinki
Jukka Partanen
Research Director, Professor
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.