Derek S. Tsang

Has grant

Country flagCanada

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

DOTATATE PET Imaging for Intracranial and Spinal Meningioma to Guide Precision Surgery and Radiation Therapy

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2024-01-01

Grant: Close

Predictive model for blood lactate in brain cancer progression-a multicentre prospective study

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2026-01-01

Grant: Close

From Computer to Clinic: Deploying Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Radiotherapy Planning for Brain Tumours

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2025-01-01

Grant: Close

A cross-sectional study of childhood brain tumours treated with proton radiation therapy in Canada

Open Date: 2022-09-01

Close Date:

Grant: Close

Improving outcomes across the cancer journey for adolescents and young adult with central nervous system tumours: The IMPACT-CNS Cohort

Open Date: 2021-04-01

Close Date: 2026-03-31

Articles (10)

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Introduction We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask‐based cobalt‐60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy ( mcfSRT ) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device. Methods Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy ( VMAT ), were re‐planned using mcfSRT . Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two‐sided paired Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans. Results The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT ( P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT ( P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10 , V25 and V50 compared with VMAT ( P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0 .1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT . Median beam‐on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT ( P = 0.002). Conclusion mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.

Year:

2022

Collaborators (9)

Sumit Gupta

University of Toronto

CANADA
View details

Joshua Moore

University of Oxford

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Andrew Gao

University Health Network

CANADA
View details

Amy Berrington

Professor & Team Leader

Institute of Cancer Research

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Matthew Mille

National Cancer Institute

UNITED STATES
View details

Eric Bouffet

University of Toronto

CANADA
View details

Vijay Ramaswamy

Assistant Professor

University of Toronto

CANADA
View details

Paul C. Nathan

-

CANADA
View details

Normand Laperriere

Professor

University of Toronto

CANADA
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.