Derek S. Tsang

Has grant

University Name
Country flag
Canada

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar
Academic Page

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

DOTATATE PET Imaging for Intracranial and Spinal Meningioma to Guide Precision Surgery and Radiation Therapy

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2024-01-01

Grant: Close

Predictive model for blood lactate in brain cancer progression-a multicentre prospective study

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2026-01-01

Grant: Close

From Computer to Clinic: Deploying Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Radiotherapy Planning for Brain Tumours

Open Date: 2023-01-01

Close Date: 2025-01-01

Grant: Close

A cross-sectional study of childhood brain tumours treated with proton radiation therapy in Canada

Open Date: 2022-09-01

Close Date:

Grant: Close

Improving outcomes across the cancer journey for adolescents and young adult with central nervous system tumours: The IMPACT-CNS Cohort

Open Date: 2021-04-01

Close Date: 2026-03-31

Articles (10)

Dosimetric evaluation of adult and paediatric brain tumours planned using mask‐based cobalt‐60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to linear accelerator‐based volumetric modulated arc therapy

Introduction We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask‐based cobalt‐60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy ( mcfSRT ) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device. Methods Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy ( VMAT ), were re‐planned using mcfSRT . Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two‐sided paired Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans. Results The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT ( P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT ( P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10 , V25 and V50 compared with VMAT ( P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0 .1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT . Median beam‐on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT ( P = 0.002). Conclusion mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.

Year:

2022

Collaborators (9)

Sumit Gupta

University of Toronto

CANADA

Joshua Moore

University of Oxford

UNITED KINGDOM

Andrew Gao

University Health Network

CANADA

Amy Berrington

Professor & Team Leader

Institute of Cancer Research

UNITED KINGDOM

Matthew Mille

National Cancer Institute

UNITED STATES

Eric Bouffet

University of Toronto

CANADA

Vijay Ramaswamy

Assistant Professor

University of Toronto

CANADA

Paul C. Nathan

-

CANADA

Normand Laperriere

Professor

University of Toronto

CANADA
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI