Derek S. Tsang
Has grant
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Recent Grants
Grant: Close
DOTATATE PET Imaging for Intracranial and Spinal Meningioma to Guide Precision Surgery and Radiation Therapy
Open Date: 2023-01-01
Close Date: 2024-01-01
Grant: Close
Predictive model for blood lactate in brain cancer progression-a multicentre prospective study
Open Date: 2023-01-01
Close Date: 2026-01-01
Grant: Close
From Computer to Clinic: Deploying Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Radiotherapy Planning for Brain Tumours
Open Date: 2023-01-01
Close Date: 2025-01-01
Grant: Close
A cross-sectional study of childhood brain tumours treated with proton radiation therapy in Canada
Open Date: 2022-09-01
Close Date:
Grant: Close
Improving outcomes across the cancer journey for adolescents and young adult with central nervous system tumours: The IMPACT-CNS Cohort
Open Date: 2021-04-01
Close Date: 2026-03-31
Articles (10)
Dosimetric evaluation of adult and paediatric brain tumours planned using mask‐based cobalt‐60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to linear accelerator‐based volumetric modulated arc therapy
Introduction We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask‐based cobalt‐60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy ( mcfSRT ) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device. Methods Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy ( VMAT ), were re‐planned using mcfSRT . Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two‐sided paired Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans. Results The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT ( P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT ( P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10 , V25 and V50 compared with VMAT ( P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0 .1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT . Median beam‐on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT ( P = 0.002). Conclusion mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.
Year:
2022
Collaborators (9)
Sumit Gupta
University of Toronto
Joshua Moore
University of Oxford
Andrew Gao
University Health Network
Amy Berrington
Professor & Team Leader
Institute of Cancer Research
Matthew Mille
National Cancer Institute
Eric Bouffet
University of Toronto
Vijay Ramaswamy
Assistant Professor
University of Toronto
Paul C. Nathan
-
Normand Laperriere
Professor
University of Toronto

How do I reach out?
Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.