Euan G. Ritchie
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (16)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Carnivores have key ecological roles in structuring and regulating ecosystems through their impacts on prey populations. When apex‐ and meso‐predators co‐occur in ecosystems, there is the potential for complex interspecific interactions and trophic dynamics that can affect the composition and functioning of ecological communities. Investigating the diet of sympatric carnivores can allow us to better understand their ecological roles (e.g. potential suppression of herbivores) or impacts (e.g. predation of threatened species). Australia's alpine region provides an ideal system in which to explore spatial and temporal variation in predator and prey interactions, using the dingo ( Canis dingo ) and invasive red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) diet. We examined the diet of dingoes and foxes across three different mountains and seasons in Victoria's alpine region, using macroscopic scat analysis. There was little diet overlap between the two carnivores, with foxes having a broader diet than dingoes. Dingoes primarily consumed larger mammal species, including invasive sambar deer ( Cervus unicolor , 44%), and the native common wombat ( Vombatus ursinus , 34%), whereas foxes typically consumed smaller mammals, including the native bush rat ( Rattus fuscipes , 55%), and the invasive European rabbit ( Oryctolagus cuniculus , 15%). Dingoes consumed more than thirty times the volume of large invasive mammals (predominantly sambar deer) than did foxes. Foxes consumed close to 15 times as many critical weight range individuals per scat than dingoes. Only one threatened critical weight range mammal species was identified within scats, the broad‐toothed rat ( Mastacomys fuscus ), found within five fox scats. Our results suggest that the introduction of novel prey may alter predator–predator interactions by causing a reduction in the dietary overlap. Therefore, in the context of integrated wildlife management and biodiversity conservation, any control of novel, invasive prey populations needs to consider possible flow on effects to apex‐ and meso‐predator diets and potential secondary impacts on native prey.
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (19)
Leonie Valentine
University of Western Australia
Aaron Greenville
Senior Lecturer in Spatial Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
The University of Sydney Library
Rachael H. Nolan
-
Heloise Gibb
Associate Professor
La Trobe University
William L. Geary
Deakin University
Nick Murphy
La Trobe University
Jonathan Webb
University of Sydney
Andrew Sih
University of California, Davis
Damian Michael
Charles Sturt University
Ayesha Tulloch
Queensland University of Technology
Melodie A. McGeoch
MONASH UNIVERSITY
Mitchell Cowan
Charles Sturt University
Ryan Shofner
Adjunct Associate Lecturer
University of New South Wales
Don Driscoll
Professor of Terrestrial Ecology
Deakin University
Ryan F Hechinger
University of California
Bronwyn A. Hradsky
-
Brad Murray
University of Sydney
Angela Pestell
Teaching & Research Fellow
Deakin University
Tim S. Doherty
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.