Euan G. Ritchie

Country flagAustralia

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (16)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Carnivores have key ecological roles in structuring and regulating ecosystems through their impacts on prey populations. When apex‐ and meso‐predators co‐occur in ecosystems, there is the potential for complex interspecific interactions and trophic dynamics that can affect the composition and functioning of ecological communities. Investigating the diet of sympatric carnivores can allow us to better understand their ecological roles (e.g. potential suppression of herbivores) or impacts (e.g. predation of threatened species). Australia's alpine region provides an ideal system in which to explore spatial and temporal variation in predator and prey interactions, using the dingo ( Canis dingo ) and invasive red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) diet. We examined the diet of dingoes and foxes across three different mountains and seasons in Victoria's alpine region, using macroscopic scat analysis. There was little diet overlap between the two carnivores, with foxes having a broader diet than dingoes. Dingoes primarily consumed larger mammal species, including invasive sambar deer ( Cervus unicolor , 44%), and the native common wombat ( Vombatus ursinus , 34%), whereas foxes typically consumed smaller mammals, including the native bush rat ( Rattus fuscipes , 55%), and the invasive European rabbit ( Oryctolagus cuniculus , 15%). Dingoes consumed more than thirty times the volume of large invasive mammals (predominantly sambar deer) than did foxes. Foxes consumed close to 15 times as many critical weight range individuals per scat than dingoes. Only one threatened critical weight range mammal species was identified within scats, the broad‐toothed rat ( Mastacomys fuscus ), found within five fox scats. Our results suggest that the introduction of novel prey may alter predator–predator interactions by causing a reduction in the dietary overlap. Therefore, in the context of integrated wildlife management and biodiversity conservation, any control of novel, invasive prey populations needs to consider possible flow on effects to apex‐ and meso‐predator diets and potential secondary impacts on native prey.

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Collaborators (19)

Leonie Valentine

University of Western Australia

AUSTRALIA
View details

Aaron Greenville

Senior Lecturer in Spatial Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

The University of Sydney Library

AUSTRALIA
View details

Rachael H. Nolan

-

AUSTRALIA
View details

Heloise Gibb

Associate Professor

La Trobe University

AUSTRALIA
View details

William L. Geary

Deakin University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Nick Murphy

La Trobe University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Jonathan Webb

University of Sydney

AUSTRALIA
View details

Andrew Sih

University of California, Davis

UNITED STATES
View details

Damian Michael

Charles Sturt University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Ayesha Tulloch

Queensland University of Technology

AUSTRALIA
View details

Melodie A. McGeoch

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Mitchell Cowan

Charles Sturt University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Ryan Shofner

Adjunct Associate Lecturer

University of New South Wales

AUSTRALIA
View details

Don Driscoll

Professor of Terrestrial Ecology

Deakin University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Ryan F Hechinger

University of California

UNITED STATES
View details

Bronwyn A. Hradsky

-

AUSTRALIA
View details

Brad Murray

University of Sydney

AUSTRALIA
View details

Angela Pestell

Teaching & Research Fellow

Deakin University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Tim S. Doherty

-

AUSTRALIA
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.