Getty Huisman-de Waal

Radboud University Medical Center
Country flag
Netherlands

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar

Articles (11)

Three Years of Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring on the General Surgical Ward: Is It Sustainable? A Qualitative Study

Continuous monitoring of vital signs using a wireless wearable device was implemented in 2018 at a surgical care unit of an academic hospital. This study aimed at gaining insight into nurses’ and patients’ perspectives regarding the use and innovation of a continuous vital signs monitoring system, three years after its introduction. This qualitative study was performed in a surgical, non-intensive care unit of an academic hospital in 2021. Key-user nurses (nurses with additional training and expertise with the device) and patients were selected for semi-structured interviews, and nurses from the ward were selected for a focus group interview using a topic list. Transcripts of the audio tapes were deductively analysed using four dimensions for adoptions of information and communication technologies (ICT) devices in healthcare. The device provided feelings of safety for nurses and patients. Nurses and patients had a few issues with the device, including the size and the battery life. Nurses gained knowledge and skills in using the system for measurement and interpretations. They perceived the system as a tool to improve the recognition of clinical decline. The use of the system could be further developed regarding the technical device’s characteristics, nurses’ interpretation of the data and the of type of alarms, the information needs of patients, and clarification of the definition and standardization of continuous monitoring. Three years after the introduction, wireless continuous vital signs monitoring is the new standard of care according to the end-users at the general surgical ward.

Year:

2024

Nurses' motivations to leave the nursing profession: A qualitative meta‐aggregation

Aim To systematically provide an overview of the qualitative evidence available on the motivations for nurses to leave the nursing profession. Design A qualitative systematic review using the meta‐aggregation design of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data Sources Qualitative studies in English, dating from 2010 until January 2023, were obtained from CINAHL, PsycINFO and PubMed. Review Methods Studies were selected using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The assessment of confidence in the review findings was done according to the ConQual approach. Results Nine papers that investigated nurses' motivations to leave the profession were included. We developed four synthesized findings from 11 synthesized categories and 31 categories to reflect nurses' motivations to leave the profession, including (1) challenging work environment, (2) emotional distress, (3) disappointment about nursing reality, and (4) culture of hierarchy and discrimination. Conclusion This review provides an in‐depth and meaningful understanding of motivations for nurses to leave the profession. Among others, poor working conditions, a lack of opportunities for career development, a lack of support from managers, work‐related stress, a discrepancy between nursing education and practice and bullying behaviour were motivations to leave the profession, which calls for targeted action to retain nurses in the profession. Impact Findings of this study shine a light on reasons why nurses leave the profession, providing evidence to support nurse managers and policymakers to develop retention strategies to move out of current crisis into recovery of sustainable global healthcare. Patient or Public Contribution There was no direct patient or caregiver contribution to this study because this study originated from the process of a Master study. However, two of the authors are still involved in clinical nursing practice and provided the necessary link between research and practice.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (11)

Harry van Goor

Radboud University Medical Center

NETHERLANDS

Anneke J. A. H. van Vught

HAN University of Applied Sciences

NETHERLANDS

Jenny Parr

Director of Patient Care, Chief Nurse and Allied Health Professions Officer

-

NEW ZEALAND

Koen Hindriks

University of Amsterdam

NETHERLANDS

Maud Heinen

-

NETHERLANDS

G.H. van den Berg

Researcher, Lecturer

Saxion University of Applied Sciences

NETHERLANDS

Janneke M. de Man‐van Ginkel

-

NETHERLANDS

Roel Boumans

Assistant Professor

Radboud University

NETHERLANDS

Fokke van Meulen

Eindhoven University of Technology

NETHERLANDS

Thóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir

-

NETHERLANDS

Mark Neerincx

Full Professor

Delft University of Technology

NETHERLANDS
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI