Meet ApplyKite Twin, the application assistant that learns with you
Meet your Twin, it learns with you
Your Twin learns with you
Launch week codes:30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro
Ends in00h00m00s
Ends in00h00m00s
Grahame J. Elder
Research Interests
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.
Explore related searches
Articles (7)
Year:
2025
Year:
2024
Fracture risk evaluation of postmenopausal women is suboptimal, but most women undergo screening mammography. Digital X‐radiogrammetry (DXR) determines bone mineral density (BMD) at the metacarpal shaft and can be performed on mammography equipment. This study examined correlations between DXR and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women undergoing mammography, to identify optimal DXR thresholds for triage to osteoporosis screening by central DXA. Postmenopausal women over age 50 years, recruited from Westmead Hospital's Breast Cancer Institute, underwent mammography, DXR and DXA. Agreements were determined using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC ROC) curve and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Optimal DXR T ‐scores to exclude osteoporosis by DXA were determined using the Youden's method. Of 200 women aged 64 ± 7 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), 82% had been diagnosed with breast cancer and 37% reported prior fracture. DXA T ‐scores were ≤ −1 at the spine, hip or forearm in 77.5% and accorded with DXR T ‐scores in 77%. For DXR and DXA T ‐scores ≤ −2.5, the AUC ROC was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–0.94) at the 1/3 radius, and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.84) for hip or spine. DXR T ‐scores > −1.98 provided a negative predictive value of 94% (range, 88%, 98%) for osteoporosis by central DXA. In response to a questionnaire, radiography staff responded that DXR added 5 minutes to patient throughput with minimal workflow impact. In the mammography setting, triaging women with a screening DXR T ‐score < −1.98 for DXA evaluation would capture a significant proportion of at‐risk women who may not otherwise be identified and improve current low rates of osteoporosis screening. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (1)
Peter Ebeling
Head
MONASH UNIVERSITY
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.