Meet ApplyKite Twin, the application assistant that learns with you
Meet your Twin, it learns with you
Your Twin learns with you
Launch week codes:30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro
Ends in00h00m00s
Ends in00h00m00s
Guillaume Martel
Research Interests
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.
Explore related searches
Articles (11)
Year:
2026
Year:
2026
Year:
2026
Year:
2026
Year:
2025
Background While red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are frequently administered during surgery, little is known about patient perspectives regarding intraoperative transfusion. The aim of this study was to understand patient perspectives about intraoperative RBC transfusion and explore their willingness to engage in transfusion prevention strategies. Study Design and Methods This descriptive qualitative study used semi‐structured patient interviews before and after surgery. Purposive sampling was used to select adult patients with varying perioperative courses, including having perioperative transfusion or postoperative anemia. Inductive and deductive thematic analyses were conducted to identify themes. Results Twenty patients (nine preoperative and 11 postoperative patients) were interviewed. The following themes were identified: Risk–benefit perception of transfusion, transfusion acceptance, trust, patient involvement in transfusion decisions, acceptance of transfusion prevention interventions, and communication. Patients perceived transfusions as low‐risk compared to the surgery itself. Factors influencing transfusion acceptance included trust in the healthcare system and the perception of the treatability of transfusion‐related complications. Some patients preferred to defer transfusion decision making to the perioperative team, citing trust in professional judgment and building a positive relationship with their surgeon. Others wished for their preferences to be incorporated into transfusion decisions. Some desired detailed blood consent conversations and most were willing to participate in strategies to reduce intraoperative transfusion. Conclusion In our sample, patients consider intraoperative transfusions as low‐risk high‐reward interventions and trust the healthcare system and perioperative team to guide intraoperative transfusion decision making. However, preoperative transfusion consent discussions were recalled as being superficial and lacking nuance. Targeted strategies are required to improve blood consent discussions to better integrate patient preferences.
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Collaborators (9)
Federico Aucejo
Director, Liver Cancer Program
Cleveland Clinic
Kari Tikkinen
University of Helsinki
Jameel Abdulrehman
University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
Joseph Shaw
Associate Scientist, Clinical Epidemiology Program
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Edsel B. Ing
Chairman, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences
University of Toronto
Sergio Acuna
Assistant Professor
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Maria P Ntalouka
Assistant Professor
University of Thessaly
Marta Berrio-Valencia
Assistant Professor
University of Ottawa
Yuki Imaoka
Assistant Professor
Hiroshima University
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.