Ignacio Malagon

Background Despite the high perioperative risk profile, international guidelines for anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) care in pediatric kidney transplantation do not exist. Optimizing hemodynamics can be challenging in these patients, while scientific data to guide decisions in hemodynamic monitoring, hemodynamic targets, and perioperative fluid management are lacking. The limited annual number of pediatric kidney transplantations, even in reference centers, necessitates the urge for international collaboration to share knowledge and develop research and guidelines. The aim of this study was to collect data on current perioperative anesthesia and ICU care practices in pediatric kidney transplantation. Methods An international survey with an anonymized link was sent from a validated electronic data capture system (Castor). Inclusion criteria were: medical doctor in anesthesia, (ICU), or pediatric nephrology working in a pediatric kidney transplantation specialized center; and signed informed consent. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Thirty‐three records were analyzed. Responders were anesthesiologists (58%), pediatric nephrologists (30%), and pediatric intensivists (12%), representing 13 countries worldwide. About half of the centers (48%) performed more than 10 pediatric kidney transplantations a year. Perioperative hemodynamic support was guided by intra‐arterial blood pressure (88%), central venous pressure (CVP; 88%), and cardiac output (CO; 39%). The most variation was seen in the hemodynamic targets CVP and CO, fluid administration, and inotrope/vasopressor use. The protocolized use of furosemide (46%) and mannitol (61%) also varied between centers. Postoperative care for the youngest recipients occurred in the pediatric intensive care unit at all centers. Conclusion The results of this survey reveal a large variation in anesthesia and ICU care in pediatric kidney transplantation centers worldwide, particularly in CVP and CO targets, hemodynamic therapy, and the use of furosemide and mannitol. These data identify areas for further research and can be a starting point for international research collaboration and guideline development.

Objectives The TensorTip™ MTX is a non-invasive device designed to determine several physiological parameters with additional analysis of haemoglobin, haematocrit and blood gas analysis by interpreting blood diffusion colour of the finger skin based on spectral analysis. The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of the TensorTip MTX in a clinical setting in comparison with routine analysis of blood samples. Methods Forty-six patients, scheduled for elective surgery, were enrolled in this study. Placement of an arterial catheter had to be part of the standard of care. Measurements were performed during the perioperative period. The measurements obtained with the TensorTip MTX were compared with the results of routine analysis of the blood samples as a reference using correlation, Bland-Altman analysis and mountain plots. Results No significant correlation was present in the measurements. Measurement of haemoglobin with the TensorTip MTX had a mean bias of 0.4 mmol/L, haematocrit’s bias was 3.0 %. Bias of partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen was 3.6 and 66.6 mmHg, respectively. Calculated percentage errors were 48.2 , 48.9, 39.9 and 109.0 %. Proportional bias was present in all Bland-Altman analyses. Less than 95 % of the differences fell within the pre-set limits of allowable error. Conclusions Non-invasive blood content analysis with the TensorTip MTX device is not equivalent to and did not correlate sufficiently with conventional laboratory analysis. None of the parameters measured showed results within the limits of allowable error. Therefore, the use of the TensorTip MTX is not recommended for perioperative care.