Kamalini Lokuge
Has grant
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Recent Grants
Grant: Close
Research program to strengthen emergency obstetric care access, quality and uptake in Sierra Leone
Open Date: 2019-01-01
Close Date: 2021-01-01
Grant: Close
PhD Scholarship for research into addressing ethnic divisions in Sri Lanka
Open Date: 2019-01-01
Close Date: 2023-01-01
Grant: Close
Primary health care in humanitarian emergencies
Open Date: 2019-01-01
Close Date: 2023-01-01
Grant: Close
Humanitarian Health Research Initiative
Open Date: 2018-01-01
Close Date: 2021-01-01
Grant: Close
Evaluation of the community health worker upskilling program in Papua New Guinea and its impact on access and quality of obstetric care
Open Date: 2018-01-01
Close Date: 2020-01-01
Articles (10)
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Background: Health system performance indicators are widely used to assess primary healthcare (PHC) performance. Despite the numerous tools and some convergence on indicator criteria, there is not a clear understanding of the common features of indicator selection processes. We aimed to review the literature to identify papers that document indicator selection processes for health system performance indicators in PHC. Methods: We searched the online databases Scopus, Medline, and CINAHL, as well as the grey literature, without time restrictions, initially on July 31, 2019 followed by an update November 13, 2020. Empirical studies or reports were included if they described the selection of health system performance indicators or frameworks, that included PHC indicators. A combination of the process focussed research question and qualitative analysis meant a quality appraisal tool or assessment of bias could not meaningfully be applied to assess individual studies. We undertook an inductive analysis based on potential indicator selection processes criteria, drawn from health system performance indicator appraisal tools reported in the literature. Results: We identified 16 503 records of which 28 were included in the review. Most studies used a descriptive case study design. We found no consistent variations between indicator selection processes of health systems of high income and low- or lower-middle income countries. Identified common features of selection processes for indicators in PHC include literature review or adaption of an existing framework as an initial step; a consensus building process with stakeholders; structuring indicators into categories; and indicator criteria focusing on validity and feasibility. The evidence around field testing with utility and consideration of reporting burden was less clear. Conclusion: Our findings highlight several characteristics of health system indicator selection processes. These features provide the groundwork to better understand how to value indicator selection processes in PHC.
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Collaborators (5)
Sally Carter
The Australian National University
Mohana Baptista
Adjunct Lecturer
MONASH UNIVERSITY
Kathryn Glass
Australian National University
Emma Field
Australian National University
Grace Joshy
Associate Professor
Australian National University
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.