Kamalini Lokuge

Has grant

Australian National University
Country flagAustralia

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Research program to strengthen emergency obstetric care access, quality and uptake in Sierra Leone

Open Date: 2019-01-01

Close Date: 2021-01-01

Grant: Close

PhD Scholarship for research into addressing ethnic divisions in Sri Lanka

Open Date: 2019-01-01

Close Date: 2023-01-01

Grant: Close

Primary health care in humanitarian emergencies

Open Date: 2019-01-01

Close Date: 2023-01-01

Grant: Close

Humanitarian Health Research Initiative

Open Date: 2018-01-01

Close Date: 2021-01-01

Grant: Close

Evaluation of the community health worker upskilling program in Papua New Guinea and its impact on access and quality of obstetric care

Open Date: 2018-01-01

Close Date: 2020-01-01

Articles (10)

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Background: Health system performance indicators are widely used to assess primary healthcare (PHC) performance. Despite the numerous tools and some convergence on indicator criteria, there is not a clear understanding of the common features of indicator selection processes. We aimed to review the literature to identify papers that document indicator selection processes for health system performance indicators in PHC. Methods: We searched the online databases Scopus, Medline, and CINAHL, as well as the grey literature, without time restrictions, initially on July 31, 2019 followed by an update November 13, 2020. Empirical studies or reports were included if they described the selection of health system performance indicators or frameworks, that included PHC indicators. A combination of the process focussed research question and qualitative analysis meant a quality appraisal tool or assessment of bias could not meaningfully be applied to assess individual studies. We undertook an inductive analysis based on potential indicator selection processes criteria, drawn from health system performance indicator appraisal tools reported in the literature. Results: We identified 16 503 records of which 28 were included in the review. Most studies used a descriptive case study design. We found no consistent variations between indicator selection processes of health systems of high income and low- or lower-middle income countries. Identified common features of selection processes for indicators in PHC include literature review or adaption of an existing framework as an initial step; a consensus building process with stakeholders; structuring indicators into categories; and indicator criteria focusing on validity and feasibility. The evidence around field testing with utility and consideration of reporting burden was less clear. Conclusion: Our findings highlight several characteristics of health system indicator selection processes. These features provide the groundwork to better understand how to value indicator selection processes in PHC.

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Collaborators (5)

Sally Carter

The Australian National University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Mohana Baptista

Adjunct Lecturer

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Kathryn Glass

Australian National University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Emma Field

Australian National University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Grace Joshy

Associate Professor

Australian National University

AUSTRALIA
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.