Michael Hofbeck

OBJECTIVES Whole-body perfusion is the combination of lower body perfusion and antegrade cerebral perfusion. This perfusion technique is used in some centres when performing aortic arch reconstruction surgery in neonates and infants. Several studies have shown intra- and postoperative benefits of this technique. However, no studies have analysed the impact it may have on the transfusion of blood products and coagulation factors. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 65 consecutive neonates and infants who underwent aortic arch reconstruction surgery from January 2014 to July 2020. Patients operated from 2014 to 2017 underwent surgery with antegrade cerebral perfusion; in patients who underwent surgery from 2017 to 2020 a whole-body perfusion strategy was used. Demographic, intra- and postoperative parameters were compared as well as intraoperative blood product and coagulation factor transfusions, chest-tube output in the first 24 h and postoperative bleeding complications. RESULTS Both groups required intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets, as well as substitution of coagulation factors. The amount of transfused volumes of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets (P-values 0.01, <0.01 and <0.01) and intraoperative transfusions of fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor were significantly lower in the whole-body perfusion group (P-value 0.04 and <0.01). CONCLUSIONS A whole-body perfusion strategy may lead to fewer intraoperative blood product and coagulation factor transfusions when compared to antegrade cerebral perfusion alone in neonates and infants undergoing complex aortic arch reconstruction surgery.

Background: Left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) stenosis following an atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) repair is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. While echocardiographic quantification of diastolic transvalvular pressure gradients is paramount in the evaluation of a newly corrected valve function, it is hypothesized that these measured gradients are overestimated immediately following a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) due to the altered hemodynamics when compared to postoperative valve assessments using awake transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) upon recovery after surgery. Methods: Out of the 72 patients screened for inclusion at a tertiary center, 39 patients undergoing an AVSD repair with both intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms (TEE, performed immediately after a CPB) and an awake TTE (performed prior to hospital discharge) were retrospectively selected. The mean (MPGs) and peak pressure gradients (PPGs) were quantified using a Doppler echocardiography and other measures of interest were recorded (e.g., a non-invasive surrogate of the cardiac output and index (CI), left ventricular ejection fraction, blood pressures and airway pressures). The variables were analyzed using the paired Student’s t-tests and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results: The MPGs were significantly higher in the intraoperative measurements when compared to the awake TTE (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 mmHg; p < 0.01); however, the PPGs did not significantly differ (6.6 ± 2.7 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8 mmHg; p = 0.06). Although the assessed intraoperative heart rates (HRs) were also higher (132 ± 17 vs. 114 ± 21 bpm; p < 0.001), there was no correlation found between the MPG and the HR, or any other parameter of interest, at either time-point. In a further analysis, a moderate to strong correlation was observed in the linear relationship between the CI and the MPG (r = 0.60; p < 0.001). During the in-hospital follow-up period, no patients died or required an intervention due to LAVV stenosis. Conclusions: The Doppler-based quantification of diastolic transvalvular LAVV mean pressure gradients using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography seems to be prone to overestimation due to altered hemodynamics immediately after an AVSD repair. Thus, the current hemodynamic state should be taken into consideration during the intraoperative interpretation of these gradients.