Mladen Doykov

Introduction: Gallstone disease (GSD) is among the most common disorders worldwide. Gallstones are established in up to 15% of the general population. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the “gold standard” for treatment of GSD but is associated with a higher rate of certain complications, namely, bile duct injury (BDI). Biliary fistulas (BF) are a common presentation of BDI (44.1% of all patients); however, they are mainly external. Post-cholecystectomy internal BF are exceedingly rare. Case report: a 33-year Caucasian female was admitted with suspected BDI after LC. Strasberg type E4 BDI was established on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Urgent laparotomy established biliary peritonitis. Delayed surgical reconstruction was planned and temporary external biliary drains were positioned in the right and left hepatic ducts. During follow-up, displacement of the drains occurred with subsequent evacuation of bile through the external fistula, which resolved spontaneously, without clinical and biochemical evidence of biliary obstruction or cholangitis. ERCP established bilio-duodenal fistula between the left hepatic duct (LHD) and duodenum, with a stricture at the level of the LHD. Endoscopic management was chosen with staged dilation and stenting of the fistulous tract over 18 months until fistula maturation and stricture resolution. One year after stent extraction, the patient remains symptom free. Discussion: Management of post-cholecystectomy BDI is challenging. The optimal approach is determined by the level and extent of ductal lesion defined according to different classifications (Strasberg, Bismuth, Hannover). Type E BDI are managed mainly surgically with a delayed surgical approach generally deemed preferable. Only three cases of choledocho-duodenal fistulas following LC BDI currently exist in the literature. Management is controversial, with expectant approach, surgical treatment (biliary reconstruction), or liver transplantation being described. Endoscopic treatment has not been described; however, in the current paper, it proved to be successful. More reports or larger case series are needed to confirm its applicability and effectiveness, especially in the long term.

Background: This study aims to establish the value of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and other magnetic resonance sequences for active surveillance of prostate cancer. The study included 530 men with an average age of 66, who were under surveillance for prostate cancer. We have used multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent transperineal biopsy (TPB) to verify the imaging findings. Results: We have observed a level of agreement of 67.30% between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, other magnetic resonance sequences, and the biopsy results. The sensitivity of the apparent diffusion coefficient is 97.14%, and the specificity is 37.50%. According to our data, apparent diffusion coefficient is the most accurate sequence, followed by diffusion imaging in prostate cancer detection. Conclusions: Based on our findings we advocate that the apparent diffusion coefficient should be included as an essential part of magnetic resonance scanning protocols for prostate cancer in at least bi-parametric settings. The best option will be apparent diffusion coefficient combined with diffusion imaging and T2 sequences. Further large-scale prospective controlled studies are required to define the precise role of multiparametric and bi-parametric magnetic resonance in the active surveillance of prostate cancer.