Mugur Geana
Has grant
Associate Professor of Health Communication
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
About
Dr. Mugur Geana is an Associate Professor of Health Communication at the University of Kansas, USA. His research focuses on emotional responses to AI-generated content, the efficacy of virtual learning environments, and the development of health communication strategies. Recent publications include studies on nutrition education, health behavior, and the impact of political ideology on public health outcomes.
Recent Grants
Grant: Close
Localized mHealth approach to boosting COVID-19 testing and vaccine literacy, access, and uptake among women with criminal legal system involvement
Open Date: 2022-01-01
Close Date: 2024-11-30
Grant: Close
The implementation of nutrition education videos for patients undergoing radical cystectomy
Open Date: 2018-07-15
Close Date: 2019-07-14
Articles (10)
Year:
2025
Background Education is, after gaming, the second largest sector embracing augmented reality (AR) at an accelerated pace, yet studies on AR's potential as an efficient learning environment had mixed results. Objectives This study's primary objective is to test students' interaction with graphical 3D elements in AR and its impact on information retention. The second objective is to compare information retention from AR engagement with information retention from exposure to identical 3D content delivered via instructional video. Finally, the third objective explores students' perceptions of AR as a learning environment. Methods Sixty‐five college students participated in a two‐arm experiment followed by semi‐structured interviews. Results and Conclusion AR can efficiently deliver a meaningful learning experience and promotes information retention. Nevertheless, AR's interactive features and novelty may distract learners while they engage with the virtual environment. Objective data obtained through eye tracking and video monitoring showed similar levels of engagement with a 3D model for both environments. While both AR and video groups showed significant knowledge gain from pre to post‐intervention, the video format was overall significantly more effective than AR in increasing topic‐related information retention. However, participants preferred the AR learning environment significantly more than the video. Takeaways Although effective, AR is still a distracting instructional environment. Designing learning experiences tailored explicitly for AR environments requires additional research to ensure its successful deployment as a learning tool.
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Collaborators (3)
Jasjit Ahluwalia
Brown University
Steven Sloman
Brown University
Pan Liu
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.