Muhammad N. S. Hadi

Has grant

University Name
Country flag
Australia

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar
Academic Page

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Geopolymer concrete for thin-walled structures in marine environment

Open Date: 2021-07-01

Close Date: 2024-07-01

Grant: Close

Mechanical behavior and design method of rectangular FRP-concrete-high strength steel hybrid multi-tube concrete columns

Open Date: 2020-01-01

Close Date: 2023-12-01

Grant: Close

Mechanical Behavior and Design Method of FRP Tube-Confined Concrete-Encased Cross-Shaped Steel Columns

Open Date: 2018-12-01

Close Date: 2022-12-01

Grant: Close

National Rock, Concrete and Advanced Composite Testing Capability

Open Date: 2016-01-01

Close Date: 2017-12-01

Grant: Close

Shear testing of the major Australian cable types under different pretension loads

Open Date: 2015-01-01

Close Date: 2016-01-01

Articles (11)

Neural network‐based models versus empirical models for the prediction of axial load‐carrying capacities of <scp>FRP</scp>‐reinforced circular concrete columns

This study presents new neural‐network (NN)‐based models to predict the axial load‐carrying capacities of fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) bar reinforced‐concrete (RC) circular columns. A database of FRP‐reinforced concrete (RC) circular columns having outside diameter and height ranged between 160–305 and 640–2500 mm, respectively was established from the literature. The axial load‐carrying capacities of FRP‐RC columns were first predicted using the empirical models developed in the literature and then predicted using deep neural‐network (DNN) and convolutional neural‐network (CNN)‐based models. The developed DNN and CNN models were calibrated using various neurons integrated in the hidden layers for the accurate predictions. Based on the results, the proposed DNN and CNN models accurately predicted the axial load‐carrying capacities of FRP‐RC circular columns with R 2 = 0.943 and R 2 = 0.936, respectively. Further, a comparative analysis showed that the proposed DNN and CNN models are more accurate than the empirical models with 52% and 42% reduction in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), respectively involved in the empirical models. Moreover, within NN‐based prediction models, the prediction accuracy of DNN model is comparatively higher than the CNN model due to the integration of neurons in each layer (9‐64‐64‐64‐64‐1) and embedded rectified linear unit (ReLu) activation function. Overall, the proposed DNN and CNN models can be utilized as paramount in the future studies.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (4)

M. Neaz Sheikh

-

AUSTRALIA

Qing Quan Liang

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor of Structural Engineering

Victoria University

AUSTRALIA

Umer Sajjad

Newcastle University

AUSTRALIA

Junaid Ahmad

Munster Technological University

IRELAND
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI