Meet ApplyKite Twin, the application assistant that learns with you
Meet your Twin, it learns with you
Your Twin learns with you
Launch week codes:30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro
Ends in00h00m00s
Ends in00h00m00s
Peter Sarich
Senior Research Fellow
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Articles (14)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background and aims Systematic reviews of the relationship between alcohol consumption and all‐cause mortality have reported different relative risk (RR) curves, possibly due to the choice of reference group. Results have varied from ‘J‐shaped’ curves, where low‐volume consumption is associated with reduced risk, to monotonically increased risk with increasing consumption. We summarised the evidence on alcohol consumption and all‐cause mortality exclusively from systematic reviews using lifetime abstainers or low‐volume/occasional drinkers as the reference group. Methods We conducted a systematic umbrella review of systematic reviews of the relationship between alcohol consumption and all‐cause mortality in prospective cohort studies using a reference group of lifetime abstainers or low‐volume/occasional drinkers. Several databases (PubMed/Medline/Embase/PsycINFO/Cochrane Library) were searched to March 2022. Reviews were assessed for risk of bias, and those with reference groups containing former drinkers were excluded. Results From 2149 articles retrieved, 25 systematic reviews were identified, and five did not include former drinkers in the reference group. Four of the five included reviews had high risk of bias. Three reviews reported a J‐shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and all‐cause mortality with significant decreased risk for low‐volume drinking (RR range 0.84 to 0.95), while two reviews did not. The one review at low risk of bias reported monotonically increased risk with greater consumption (RRs = 1.02, 1.13, 1.33 and 1.52 for low‐, medium‐, high‐ and higher‐volume drinking, respectively, compared with occasional drinking). All five reviews reported significantly increased risk with higher levels of alcohol consumption (RR range 1.28 to 3.70). Sub‐group analyses were reported by sex and age; however, there were evidence gaps for many important factors. Conversely, 17 of 20 excluded systematic reviews reported decreased mortality risk for low‐volume drinking. Conclusions Over 70% of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published to March 2022 of all‐cause mortality risk associated with alcohol consumption did not exclude former drinkers from the reference group and may therefore be biased by the ‘sick‐quitter effect’.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Collaborators (16)
Henry M Marshall
University of Queensland
Katherine Thurber
Australian National University
Silvia Behar Harpaz
Lecturer EF
University of New South Wales
Marianne F. Weber
University of Sydney
Kedir Yimam Ahmed
Charles Sturt University
David Mizrahi
University of Sydney
Sonya Cressman
Assistant Professor
Simon Fraser University
Abel Fekadu Dadi
Charles Darwin University
Mahdi Sheikh
Scientist
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Getiye Dejenu Kibret
Macquarie University
Jennifer Welsh
The Australian National University
Sarsha Yap
The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW
Nehmat Houssami
Professor of Public Health
The University of Sydney School of Medicine
Emily Banks
Australian National University
Tom Dudding
Consultant Senior Lecturer Restorative Dentistry
University of Bristol
Grace Joshy
Associate Professor
Australian National University
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.