Roberto C. Delgado Bolton

Initial staging of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) can lead to negative results using conventional diagnostic imaging workup, including [18F]Fluorodesoxiglucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]Fluorocholine ([18F]FCH) PET/CT in the initial staging of MM patients who were candidates for autologous bone marrow transplant. Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria of our study were: (a) patients diagnosed with MM; (b) candidates for autologous bone marrow transplant (AT); and (c) studied with [18F]FCH PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for initial staging less than 4 weeks apart. Imaging analysis included the presence of: bone marrow infiltration, focal bone lesions, and para-medullary or extra-medullary disease, according to the proposed IMPeTus criteria. The analysis was performed per lesion, per patient, and per location. Results: The study population included ten patients. Globally, [18F]FCH PET/CT showed bone marrow uptake in all the patients and visualised 16 more focal lesions than [18F]FDG PET/CT. One patient presented a plasmacytoma, detected by both tracers. Extra-medullary and para-medullary disease was identified with different degrees of uptake by both tracers. In summary, [18F]FCH PET seemed to be superior to [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting focal bone lesions. SUVmax values were slightly higher in [18F]FCH PET/CT than in [18F]FDG PET/CT. Conclusions: Taking into account the small study population, according to our results, [18F]FCH PET/CT could be a useful tool for staging MM patients.

Approximately one out of ten COVID-19 cases in Ecuador was a physician. It has been reported that this situation has led to a serious detriment of physicians’ health and well-being. This study aimed to (i) identify predictors of emotional exhaustion, somatization, and work alienation in Ecuadorian physicians working with COVID-19 patients and (ii) explore the pandemic impact on doctor–patient relationships and on empathy. In 79 Ecuadorian physicians (45 women) who worked with COVID-19 patients, two separate multiple regression models explained the following: 73% of the variability of emotional exhaustion was based on somatization, work alienation, working sector, and passing through a symptomatic infection (p < 0.001), and 56% of the variability of somatization was based on gender and emotional exhaustion (p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, intention to leave the profession was more frequent among physicians with greater work alienation (p = 0.003). On the contrary, more empathic physicians never considered leaving their profession during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.03). In physicians’ verbatim, cognitive empathy appeared associated to a positive change in doctor–patient relationships. On the contrary, having an overwhelming emotional empathy appeared associated to a negative change in doctor–patient relationships. These findings characterize differences in how physicians cope while working in the frontline of the pandemic.