Senu Apewokin

Infectious diseases (ID) research is vital for global public health, typically led by physician-scientists. This Perspective addresses challenges in the ID workforce and suggests solutions. Physician-scientists have made key discoveries that have significantly impacted human health. The importance of ID research in understanding diseases, leading to treatments and vaccines, is emphasized, along with the need to address persistent and new infections, antimicrobial resistance, and threats like HIV and influenza. The paper analyzes the physician-scientist workforce's struggles, including funding, training, and research-practice integration gaps. We suggest increased funding, better training, and mentorship, more collaborative and interdisciplinary research, and improved recognition systems. The article stresses the urgency of supporting physician-scientists in ID, advocating for proactive prevention and preparedness, and calls for immediate action to enhance ID research and care.

Background Viral infections such as adenovirus (ADV), BK virus (BKV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) after kidney transplantation negatively impact outcomes in transplant recipients despite advancements in screening and antiviral therapy. We describe our experience of using the virus‐specific T cell therapy (VSTs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at our transplant center. Methods This is a retrospective, single center review of KTR with ADV, BKV and CMV infections between June 2021 and December 2022. These patients received third party VSTs as part of the management of infections. The immunosuppression, details of infection and outcome data were obtained from electronic medical records. Results Two cases of ADV infection resolved after one infusion of VSTs. The response rate of BKV and CMV infection was not as robust with close to 50% reduction in median viral load after VSTs. Out of 23 patients, two patients developed chronic allograft nephropathy from membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and acute rejection. Conclusion Patients that are resistant to antivirals or who have worsening viremia despite conventional management may benefit from VSTs therapy to treat underlying viral infection. Additional studies are needed to ascertain efficacy and short‐ and long‐term risks secondary to VSTs. image

Background Ocular candidiasis is a known complication of candidemia. Given the poor ocular penetration of echinocandins, there is some concern that the increasing use of echinocandins may portend an increased incidence of ophthalmic complications. We examined the changing trends in antifungal prescribing patterns and the incidence of ophthalmic complications after candidemia. Methods Patients with blood cultures positive for Candida species between January 2014 and June 2020 who underwent screening fundoscopic examination by an ophthalmologist were analyzed. The χ2 analysis was used to compare antifungal prescriptions and ocular exam findings before and after 2016. Trend analysis was also performed to assess temporal changes in prescribing practices and eye exam findings. Results There were 226 candidemia cases during the study period, 129 (57.1%) of which underwent screening eye exams. From 2014 to 2015, 24 of 37 (64.5%) patients received eye-penetrating antifungals compared to 36 of 92 (39.1%) from 2016 to 2020 (P = .008). Overall, 30 of 129 (23.3%) patients had abnormal eye exams with the prevalence of abnormal findings being 7 of 37 (18.9%) before 2016 compared to 23 of 92 (25%, P = .46) thereafter. A trend analysis revealed an increase in abnormal eye findings over the study period (P = .008). Of the 30 patients who had abnormal eye exams, 9 (30%) had a change in systemic antifungal therapy from echinocandins to eye-penetrating antifungals. Echinocandin use was associated with abnormal eye findings. Conclusions Prescription of eye-penetrating antifungals for candidemia has trended down since 2016. This was associated with a concomitant increase in abnormal findings on screening fundoscopy. Abnormal eye exams were not uncommon throughout our study period.