Jason Chin

Senior Lecturer

Australian National University

Australia

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Professors in Australia

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

About

Dr. Jason Chin is a Senior Lecturer at the Australian National University, Australia. His research primarily focuses on the intersection of law and psychology, particularly in areas such as forensic science, expert testimony, and empirical legal studies. Recent publications explore psychological insights in legal contexts, systematic reviews in forensic science, and transparency in quantitative criminology.

Articles (15)

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (8)

Andrew Roberts

Professor

University of Melbourne

AUSTRALIA

View details

Tess Neal

Associate Professor and Dean's Professor

Iowa State University

UNITED STATES

View details

Elizabeth Tenney

University of Utah

UNITED STATES

View details

Bethany Growns

Lecturer

University of Canterbury

NEW ZEALAND

View details

Irena Boskovic

Erasmus University Rotterdam

NETHERLANDS

View details

Gianni Ribeiro

Lecturer

University of Southern Queensland

AUSTRALIA

View details

Matthew J. Page

AUSTRALIA

View details

Gary Edmond

Professor

University of New South Wales

AUSTRALIA

View details

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Jason Chin

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

About

Articles (15)

Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts

Understanding ‘error’ in the forensic sciences: A primer

A plan for systematic reviews for high-need areas in forensic science.

Team scientists should normalize disagreement

The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study

If generalization is the grail, practical relevance is the nirvana: Considerations from the contribution of psychological science of memory to law.

Further caution is required on what memory experts can reliably say

Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology

Law and psychology must think critically about effect sizes

The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study

Visual Decision Aids: Improving Laypeople’s Understanding of Forensic Science Evidence

Registered reports in forensic science

The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science

Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency

Simply Unconvincing: The High Court on Probative Value and Reliability in the <i>Uniform Evidence Law</i>

Collaborators (8)

Andrew Roberts

Tess Neal

Elizabeth Tenney

Bethany Growns

Irena Boskovic

Gianni Ribeiro

Matthew J. Page

Gary Edmond

Make your next move.