Juan C. Mauricio

Vinegar is one of the most appreciated fermented foods in European and Asian countries. In industry, its elaboration depends on numerous factors, including the nature of starter culture and raw material, as well as the production system and operational conditions. Furthermore, vinegar is obtained by the action of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) on an alcoholic medium in which ethanol is transformed into acetic acid. Besides the highlighted oxidative metabolism of AAB, their versatility and metabolic adaptability make them a taxonomic group with several biotechnological uses. Due to new and rapid advances in this field, this review attempts to approach the current state of knowledge by firstly discussing fundamental aspects related to industrial vinegar production and then exploring aspects related to AAB: classification, metabolism, and applications. Emphasis has been placed on an exhaustive taxonomic review considering the progressive increase in the number of new AAB species and genera, especially those with recognized biotechnological potential.

This study compares three yeast strains: two wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (Sc1 and Sc5) and a commercial strain (Lc). The objective is to assess their fermentation efficiency and volatile compound production. The factors examined are yeast strain, initial sugar concentration of the must, and the presence of sulfur dioxide. Volatile aroma compounds, determined via GC–MS, were categorized into aromatic series based on aroma descriptors. Out of the volatile compounds analyzed, the yeast strain influenced 39, while sugar content and sulfur dioxide affected 16 and 23 compounds, respectively. Twelve compounds displayed odor activity values exceeding unity, with notable contributions from ethyl esters, β-damascenone, and β-ionone, impacting fruit, floral, and herbal aromatic series. Overall, the Sc1 yeast strain exhibited higher values in the aromatic series compared to the Lc strain. Multivariate analysis revealed that the Sc1 strain highlighted green fruit, citrus, and spice series, while the Lc strain stood out for smoky and herbal aromas. Cluster and principal component analyses emphasized that the aromatic composition of wines produced with wild yeast strains is more influenced by sulfur dioxide than initial sugar content, whereas the opposite holds true for the commercial strain. The key aroma series distinguishing between yeast strains were fruity, green fruit, and citrus for Sc1, and herbal, floral, and smoky for Lc. In conclusion, the Sc1 wild yeast strain showed similar fermentation behavior to the commercial strain, resulting in increased aroma compound presence. The distinctive aromatic profiles contributed by each strain enable winemakers to leverage this diversity and create wines that emphasize specific aromas.