Lesley Verhofstadt

Country flagBelgium

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (19)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Objective Cancer predisposition syndromes are being more frequently recognized in the etiology of pediatric oncology and genetic‐related technologies are evolving rapidly, leading to an increasing availability of genetic testing for families. This systematic review assessed the psychological impact of genetic testing on children and parents in the context of childhood cancer. Methods Searches were performed using three databases (Web of Science, Pubmed and Embase) to identify relevant empirical studies. Following Cochrane guidelines, we screened 3838 articles and identified 18 eligible studies, representing the perspectives of children and/or parents. Results The included studies described the impact of genetic testing in different contexts (e.g. predictive testing and diagnostic testing) and in different subgroups, (e.g. carriers and non‐carriers). Overall, the studies did not identify clinically‐relevant long‐term increases in negative emotions (depression, anxiety, distress, uncertainty, guilt) as a result of genetic testing. Negative emotions were typically time‐limited and generally occurred in families with particular characteristics (e.g. those with a history of multiple cancer diagnoses, families receiving an unfavorable result for one child and a favorable result in siblings, and those with pre‐existing mental health difficulties). Positive emotions (hopefulness, relief and peace of mind) were also reported. Knowing their genetic risk status appeared to help to foster empowerment among families, regardless of the result and any associated emotions. Conclusions Genetic testing in pediatric oncology does not appear to cause significant additional harm and can lead to positive outcomes. Clinicians need to be especially attentive when counseling families at increased risk of distress.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Collaborators (21)

David P. Schmitt

Brunel University London

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Anne-Lore Scherrens

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

BELGIUM
View details

Sónia Bernardes

ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa

PORTUGAL
View details

Piet Bracke

Professor in sociology

University of Ghent Health and Demographic Research

BELGIUM
View details

Manasi Murthy Mittinty

Flinders University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Bart Soenens

Ghent University

BELGIUM
View details

Laura Sels

Ghent University

BELGIUM
View details

Gyesook Yoo

Professor

Kyungpook National University

SOUTH KOREA
View details

Liesbet Goubert

Full Professor

Ghent University

BELGIUM
View details

Evangelos Karademas

Professor of Clinical Health Psychology

University of Crete

GREECE
View details

Luis Angel Saúl

Profesor titular

Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)

SPAIN
View details

Selina Andrea Landolt

University of Zurich

SWITZERLAND
View details

Tamás Martos

Full Professor

University of Szeged

HUNGARY
View details

Bogdan Gabrys

Professor of Data Science

University of Sydney

AUSTRALIA
View details

Kasia Uzieblo

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

BELGIUM
View details

Susanna Joo

Yonsei University

SOUTH KOREA
View details

Sarah Galdiolo

University of Mons

BELGIUM
View details

Lara Stas

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

BELGIUM
View details

Claudia CHIAROLANZA

Assistant Professor

Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia

ITALY
View details

Sofia Major

Assistant Professor

University of the Azores

PORTUGAL
View details

Kaichiro Furutani

Professer

Kansai University

JAPAN
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.