Marieke J.H. Wermer

Background and purpose Patients who underwent red blood cell (RBC) transfusion from donors who later developed multiple spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) have recently been identified to have increased risk of ICH themselves. This increased risk of ICH was hypothesized to be related to iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (iCAA) transmission. Two cases are presented who had RBC transfusion as an infant and presented with CAA at a relatively young age decades later. Method Cases were identified by prospectively asking all patients at our CAA outpatient clinic (November 2023 to January 2024) about a medical history with RBC transfusion or history with a high likelihood for RBC transfusion (e.g., hemolytic disease, trauma with massive hemorrhage). Eligible patients were all diagnosed with CAA, CAA with concomitant hypertensive arteriopathy or iCAA, and without hereditary CAA. Results Between November 2023 and January 2024, 2/35 (6%, 95% confidence interval 2%–19%) outpatient clinic patients had a history of RBC transfusion and none had a high likelihood medical history. The cases presented at age 47 and 57 and had already developed severe CAA. Conclusions Red blood cell transfusion might be a possible mechanism for iCAA; however, further prospective data collection and experimental evidence concerning blood transmission of amyloid‐β are needed.

BACKGROUND: The temporal ordering of biomarkers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is important for their use in trials and for the understanding of the pathological cascade of CAA. We investigated the presence and abnormality of the most common biomarkers in the largest (pre)symptomatic Dutch-type hereditary CAA (D-CAA) cohort to date. METHODS: We included cross-sectional data from participants with (pre)symptomatic D-CAA and controls without CAA. We investigated CAA-related cerebral small vessel disease markers on 3T-MRI, cerebrovascular reactivity with functional 7T-MRI (fMRI) and amyloid-β 40 and amyloid-β 42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid. We calculated frequencies and plotted biomarker abnormality according to age to form scatterplots. RESULTS: We included 68 participants with D-CAA (59% presymptomatic, mean age, 50 [range, 26–75] years; 53% women), 53 controls (mean age, 51 years; 42% women) for cerebrospinal fluid analysis and 36 controls (mean age, 53 years; 100% women) for fMRI analysis. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 40 and amyloid-β 42 levels were the earliest biomarkers present: all D-CAA participants had lower levels of amyloid-β 40 and amyloid-β 42 compared with controls (youngest participant 30 years). Markers of nonhemorrhagic injury (>20 enlarged perivascular spaces in the centrum semiovale and white matter hyperintensities Fazekas score, ≥2, present in 83% [n=54]) and markers of impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (abnormal BOLD amplitude, time to peak and time to baseline, present in 56% [n=38]) were present from the age of 30 years. Finally, markers of hemorrhagic injury were present in 64% (n=41) and only appeared after the age of 41 years (first microbleeds and macrobleeds followed by cortical superficial siderosis). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that amyloid biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid are the first to become abnormal in CAA, followed by MRI biomarkers for cerebrovascular reactivity and nonhemorrhagic injury and lastly hemorrhagic injury. This temporal ordering probably reflects the pathological stages of CAA and should be taken into account when future therapeutic trials targeting specific stages are designed.