Robbie Sutton
Professor of Social Psychology
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (15)
Four pre-registered studies examined the semantic and causal relation between conspiracy mentality and belief in conspiracy theories. Study 1 ( N = 251) confirmed important differences between these two constructs. Participants perceived conspiracy mentality propositions as general rules and conspiracy theories as specific examples. This perception that conspiracy mentality statements are more general was associated with the perception that they are more plausible and, if shared, less likely to cause dispute and to stigmatize the communicator. Conceptualizing them as different constructs, Studies 2–4 together indicate that they might have a bidirectional causal relationship with each other. Affirming conspiracy theories set in real-world and fictional societies increased participants’ conspiracy mentality scores, relative to negations of conspiracy theories (Studies 2, 3) and a baseline condition (Study 4). Conversely, affirming conspiracy mentality statements increased participants’ endorsement of conspiracy theories (Study 4). The semantic relation between the two constructs means each may reinforce the other through inductive and deductive reasoning. Nonetheless, important social-psychological differences may emerge between them due to the greater specificity and epistemic riskiness of conspiracy theories compared to the conspiracy mentality.
Year:
2024
In this research spotlight, we respond to Nera’s (2024 , this issue) critique of the conspiracy mentality. We agree that the concept of the conspiracy mentality – and its relation to belief in conspiracy theories – requires further clarification. We also agree that the causal relationship between conspiracy mentality and belief in conspiracy theories may be bidirectional. We elaborate on these arguments by adding additional critical points and providing recommendations for researchers. We see the chief value of the construct as making it possible to tease apart (e.g., in covariance analyses) belief in conspiracy theories from the political attitudes that underlie them.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Collaborators (13)
Kristof Dhont
-
Yasin Koc
Assistant Professor of Social Psychology
University of Groningen
Ben Gützkow
University of Groningen
Georgios Abakoumkin
University of Thessaly
Karen M. Douglas
University of Kent
Jared Piazza
University of Lancaster
Anna Kende
Associate professor
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Ioanna Kapantai
Lecturer in Psychology
University of Kent
Daniel Jolley
Assistant Professor
University of Nottingham
Stefan Leach
University of Lancaster
Mioara Cristea
Heriot-Watt University
HANDAN AKKAŞ
Tilburg University
Carolina Trella
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.