Robbie Sutton

Professor of Social Psychology

University of Kent
Country flagUnited Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (15)

Four pre-registered studies examined the semantic and causal relation between conspiracy mentality and belief in conspiracy theories. Study 1 ( N = 251) confirmed important differences between these two constructs. Participants perceived conspiracy mentality propositions as general rules and conspiracy theories as specific examples. This perception that conspiracy mentality statements are more general was associated with the perception that they are more plausible and, if shared, less likely to cause dispute and to stigmatize the communicator. Conceptualizing them as different constructs, Studies 2–4 together indicate that they might have a bidirectional causal relationship with each other. Affirming conspiracy theories set in real-world and fictional societies increased participants’ conspiracy mentality scores, relative to negations of conspiracy theories (Studies 2, 3) and a baseline condition (Study 4). Conversely, affirming conspiracy mentality statements increased participants’ endorsement of conspiracy theories (Study 4). The semantic relation between the two constructs means each may reinforce the other through inductive and deductive reasoning. Nonetheless, important social-psychological differences may emerge between them due to the greater specificity and epistemic riskiness of conspiracy theories compared to the conspiracy mentality.

Year:

2024

In this research spotlight, we respond to Nera’s (2024 , this issue) critique of the conspiracy mentality. We agree that the concept of the conspiracy mentality – and its relation to belief in conspiracy theories – requires further clarification. We also agree that the causal relationship between conspiracy mentality and belief in conspiracy theories may be bidirectional. We elaborate on these arguments by adding additional critical points and providing recommendations for researchers. We see the chief value of the construct as making it possible to tease apart (e.g., in covariance analyses) belief in conspiracy theories from the political attitudes that underlie them.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Collaborators (13)

Kristof Dhont

-

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Yasin Koc

Assistant Professor of Social Psychology

University of Groningen

NETHERLANDS
View details

Ben Gützkow

University of Groningen

NETHERLANDS
View details

Georgios Abakoumkin

University of Thessaly

GREECE
View details

Karen M. Douglas

University of Kent

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Jared Piazza

University of Lancaster

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Anna Kende

Associate professor

Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem

HUNGARY
View details

Ioanna Kapantai

Lecturer in Psychology

University of Kent

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Daniel Jolley

Assistant Professor

University of Nottingham

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Stefan Leach

University of Lancaster

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Mioara Cristea

Heriot-Watt University

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

HANDAN AKKAŞ

Tilburg University

NETHERLANDS
View details

Carolina Trella

-

UNITED KINGDOM
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.