Seye Abimbola

University of Sydney
Country flagAustralia

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (21)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

There is growing scholarly interest in what leads to global or national prioritization of specific health issues. By retrospectively analysing agenda setting for India’s national burn programme, this study aimed to better understand how the agenda-setting process influenced its design, implementation and performance. We conducted document reviews and key informant interviews with stakeholders and used a combination of analytical frameworks on policy prioritization and issue framing for analysis. The READ (readying material, extracting data, analysing data and distilling findings) approach was used for document reviews, and qualitative thematic analysis was used for coding and analysis of documents and interviews. The findings suggest three critical features of burns care policy prioritization in India: challenges of issue characteristics, divergent portrayal of ideas and its framing as a social and/or health issue and over-centralization of agenda setting. First, lack of credible indicators on the magnitude of the problem and evidence on interventions limited issue framing, advocacy and agenda setting. Second, the policy response to burns has two dimensions in India: response to gender-based intentional injuries and the healthcare response. While intentional burns have received policy attention, the healthcare response was limited until the national programme was initiated in 2010 and scaled up in 2014. Third, over-centralization of agenda setting (dominated by a few homogenous actors, located in the national capital, with attention focused on the national ministry of health) contributed to limitations in programme design and implementation. We note following elements to consider when analysing issues of significant burden but limited priority: the need to analyse how actors influence issue framing, the particularities of issues, the inadequacy of any one dominant frame and the limited intersection of frames. Based on this analysis in India, we recommend a decentralized approach to agenda setting and for the design and implementation of national programmes from the outset.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (12)

Madhukar Pai

Professor

McGill University

CANADA
View details

Lukas Engelmann

University of Edinburgh

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Sonja van Wichelen

Associate Professor

University of Sydney

AUSTRALIA
View details

Kari Lancaster

UNSW Sydney

AUSTRALIA
View details

Diederick E Grobbee

University Medical Center Groningen

NETHERLANDS
View details

meru sheel

The University of Sydney School of Public Health

AUSTRALIA
View details

Margaret Peden

Imperial College London

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Olutobi Sanuade

Research Assistant Professor

University of Utah

UNITED STATES
View details

Koen Peeters Grietens

Professor

-

JAPAN
View details

Rolf Groenwold

Professor of Clinical Epidemiology

Leiden University Medical Center

NETHERLANDS
View details

Sarah Bernays

University of Sydney

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Barbara Casadei

University of Oxford

UNITED KINGDOM
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.