Seye Abimbola
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (21)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
There is growing scholarly interest in what leads to global or national prioritization of specific health issues. By retrospectively analysing agenda setting for India’s national burn programme, this study aimed to better understand how the agenda-setting process influenced its design, implementation and performance. We conducted document reviews and key informant interviews with stakeholders and used a combination of analytical frameworks on policy prioritization and issue framing for analysis. The READ (readying material, extracting data, analysing data and distilling findings) approach was used for document reviews, and qualitative thematic analysis was used for coding and analysis of documents and interviews. The findings suggest three critical features of burns care policy prioritization in India: challenges of issue characteristics, divergent portrayal of ideas and its framing as a social and/or health issue and over-centralization of agenda setting. First, lack of credible indicators on the magnitude of the problem and evidence on interventions limited issue framing, advocacy and agenda setting. Second, the policy response to burns has two dimensions in India: response to gender-based intentional injuries and the healthcare response. While intentional burns have received policy attention, the healthcare response was limited until the national programme was initiated in 2010 and scaled up in 2014. Third, over-centralization of agenda setting (dominated by a few homogenous actors, located in the national capital, with attention focused on the national ministry of health) contributed to limitations in programme design and implementation. We note following elements to consider when analysing issues of significant burden but limited priority: the need to analyse how actors influence issue framing, the particularities of issues, the inadequacy of any one dominant frame and the limited intersection of frames. Based on this analysis in India, we recommend a decentralized approach to agenda setting and for the design and implementation of national programmes from the outset.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Collaborators (12)
Madhukar Pai
Professor
McGill University
Lukas Engelmann
University of Edinburgh
Sonja van Wichelen
Associate Professor
University of Sydney
Kari Lancaster
UNSW Sydney
Diederick E Grobbee
University Medical Center Groningen
meru sheel
The University of Sydney School of Public Health
Margaret Peden
Imperial College London
Olutobi Sanuade
Research Assistant Professor
University of Utah
Koen Peeters Grietens
Professor
-
Rolf Groenwold
Professor of Clinical Epidemiology
Leiden University Medical Center
Sarah Bernays
University of Sydney
Barbara Casadei
University of Oxford
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.