Falko F Sniehotta
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (12)
Background NULevel was a randomized control trial to evaluate a technology-assisted weight loss maintenance (WLM) program in the UK. The program included: (a) a face-to-face goal-setting session; (b) an internet platform, a pedometer, and wirelessly connected scales to monitor and report diet, physical activity, and weight, and; (c) regular automated feedback delivered by mobile phone, tailored to participants’ progress. Components were designed to target psychological processes linked to weight-related behavior. Though intervention participants showed increased physical activity, there was no difference in WLM between the intervention and control groups after 12 months (Sniehotta FF, Evans EH, Sainsbury K, et al. Behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance versus standard weight advice in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial in the UK (NULevel Trial). PLoS Med. 2019; 16(5):e1002793. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002793). It is unclear whether the program failed to alter targeted psychological processes, or whether changes in these processes failed to influence WLM. Purpose We evaluate whether the program influenced 16 prespecified psychological processes (e.g., self-efficacy and automaticity toward diet and physical activity), and whether these processes (at 6 months) were associated with successful WLM (at 12 months). Methods 288 adults who had previously lost weight were randomized to the intervention or control groups. The control group received wireless scales and standard advice via newsletters. Assessments occurred in person at 0, 6, and 12 months. Results The intervention significantly altered 10 of the 16 psychological processes, compared with the control group. However, few processes were associated with WLM, leading to no significant indirect effects of the intervention via the processes on WLM. Conclusions Changes in targeted processes were insufficient to support WLM. Future efforts may more closely examine the sequence of effects between processes, behavior, and WLM.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Collaborators (27)
Keven Joyal-Desmarais
Lecturer in Psychology
University of Leeds
Eileen Kaner
Professor of Public Health & Primary Care Research
Newcastle University
Katherine Jackson
Newcastle University
Vera Araujo-Soares
University of Twente
Nelli Hankonen
University of Helsinki
Lucia Rehackova
Northumbria University
Hanna Konttinen
University of Helsinki
Keegan Knittle
University of Helsinki
Mei Yee Tang
University of Leeds
paul chadwick
University College London
Boris Cheval
Assistant Professor
École Normale Supérieure
Pedro Teixeira
Full professor
Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon
Benjamin Gardner
Reader in Psychology
-
Jan Lecouturier
Newcastle University
Elizabeth Evans
Assistant professor
University of Durham
Sarah Charman
Newcastle University
Michael E J Lean
University of Glasgow
António Palmeira
-
Matti Heino
University of Tampere
Michael Catt
Emeritus Professor
Newcastle University
Cristiana Duarte
York St John University
Ari Haukkala
University of Helsinki
Roy Taylor
Professor of Medicine and Metabolism; Magnetic Resonance Centre
Newcastle University
R James Stubbs
Professor of Appetite and Energy Balance
University of Leeds
Naomi Brosnahan
University of Glasgow
Leah Avery
Professor of Applied Health Psychology
Teesside University
Carly J. Meyer
University of Queensland
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.