Keven Joyal-Desmarais

Lecturer in Psychology

University of Leeds
Country flagUnited Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (10)

Background NULevel was a randomized control trial to evaluate a technology-assisted weight loss maintenance (WLM) program in the UK. The program included: (a) a face-to-face goal-setting session; (b) an internet platform, a pedometer, and wirelessly connected scales to monitor and report diet, physical activity, and weight, and; (c) regular automated feedback delivered by mobile phone, tailored to participants’ progress. Components were designed to target psychological processes linked to weight-related behavior. Though intervention participants showed increased physical activity, there was no difference in WLM between the intervention and control groups after 12 months (Sniehotta FF, Evans EH, Sainsbury K, et al. Behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance versus standard weight advice in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial in the UK (NULevel Trial). PLoS Med. 2019; 16(5):e1002793. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002793). It is unclear whether the program failed to alter targeted psychological processes, or whether changes in these processes failed to influence WLM. Purpose We evaluate whether the program influenced 16 prespecified psychological processes (e.g., self-efficacy and automaticity toward diet and physical activity), and whether these processes (at 6 months) were associated with successful WLM (at 12 months). Methods 288 adults who had previously lost weight were randomized to the intervention or control groups. The control group received wireless scales and standard advice via newsletters. Assessments occurred in person at 0, 6, and 12 months. Results The intervention significantly altered 10 of the 16 psychological processes, compared with the control group. However, few processes were associated with WLM, leading to no significant indirect effects of the intervention via the processes on WLM. Conclusions Changes in targeted processes were insufficient to support WLM. Future efforts may more closely examine the sequence of effects between processes, behavior, and WLM.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (14)

Drieda ZACE

Lecturer

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

ITALY
View details

Falko F Sniehotta

Heidelberg University

GERMANY
View details

Thomas Kubiak

-

GERMANY
View details

Mohamad Baydoun

Assistant Professor

University of Regina

CANADA
View details

Ben Van Dusen

Assistant Professor

Iowa State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Vera Araujo-Soares

University of Twente

NETHERLANDS
View details

Joanne Enticott

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Iveta Nagyova

-

SLOVAKIA
View details

Paul Fuglestad

Associate Professor

University of North Florida

UNITED STATES
View details

Eli Puterman

Assistant Professor

The University of British Columbia

CANADA
View details

Elizabeth Evans

Assistant professor

University of Durham

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Kim L. Lavoie

-

CANADA
View details

Eric B. Kennedy

York University

CANADA
View details

Alexander Rothman

University of Minnesota

UNITED STATES
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.