Vera Araujo-Soares
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (18)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background NULevel was a randomized control trial to evaluate a technology-assisted weight loss maintenance (WLM) program in the UK. The program included: (a) a face-to-face goal-setting session; (b) an internet platform, a pedometer, and wirelessly connected scales to monitor and report diet, physical activity, and weight, and; (c) regular automated feedback delivered by mobile phone, tailored to participants’ progress. Components were designed to target psychological processes linked to weight-related behavior. Though intervention participants showed increased physical activity, there was no difference in WLM between the intervention and control groups after 12 months (Sniehotta FF, Evans EH, Sainsbury K, et al. Behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance versus standard weight advice in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial in the UK (NULevel Trial). PLoS Med. 2019; 16(5):e1002793. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002793). It is unclear whether the program failed to alter targeted psychological processes, or whether changes in these processes failed to influence WLM. Purpose We evaluate whether the program influenced 16 prespecified psychological processes (e.g., self-efficacy and automaticity toward diet and physical activity), and whether these processes (at 6 months) were associated with successful WLM (at 12 months). Methods 288 adults who had previously lost weight were randomized to the intervention or control groups. The control group received wireless scales and standard advice via newsletters. Assessments occurred in person at 0, 6, and 12 months. Results The intervention significantly altered 10 of the 16 psychological processes, compared with the control group. However, few processes were associated with WLM, leading to no significant indirect effects of the intervention via the processes on WLM. Conclusions Changes in targeted processes were insufficient to support WLM. Future efforts may more closely examine the sequence of effects between processes, behavior, and WLM.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Collaborators (26)
Keven Joyal-Desmarais
Lecturer in Psychology
University of Leeds
Falko F Sniehotta
Heidelberg University
Martha Canfield
King’s College London
Zoi Toumpakari
University of Bristol
Jessica Walburn
King’s College London
Eileen Kaner
Professor of Public Health & Primary Care Research
Newcastle University
Nelli Hankonen
University of Helsinki
Sergi Fàbregues
Associate Professor
Universitat de Girona
Russell (Russ) Jago
University of Bristol
Hanna Konttinen
University of Helsinki
Rebecca Anderson-Kittow
University of Oxford
Claudia Teran Escobar
Assistant Professor
Université Paris Nanterre
Linda Sharp
-
Benjamin Gardner
Reader in Psychology
-
Paquito Bernard
Assistant professor
Université de Montréal
Elizabeth Evans
Assistant professor
University of Durham
Justine Blanford
University of Twente
Sam Norton
Prof at King's College London
King’s College London
Ari Haukkala
University of Helsinki
Pamela Gallagher
Dublin City University
laura Ternent
Senior Lecturer
Newcastle University
Laura M König
Professor of Health Psychology
Universität Wien
Myfanwy Morgan
Visiting Professor
King’s College London
Martin Tovee
Northumbria University
Nicole M.A. Blijlevens
Radboud University Medical Center
Jeanette Falck Winther
Consultant, Head of Childhood Cancer Survivorship (CCS) Research Group
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.