Jennifer Cleland

Aim When making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision‐making and experience of complications. Method This qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK‐based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework. Results Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision‐making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision‐making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision‐making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified. Conclusion Colorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal ‘failures’, which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify ‘personalized’ methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes.