Ángela Hernández-Ruiz
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (10)
Context Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders in childhood. Antiepileptic drugs are the preferred treatment. However, 30% of children continue suffering seizures. A ketogenic diet (KD) is one of the emerging alternative treatments. Objective This review aims to analyze the current evidence regarding the use of a KD for the treatment of refractory epilepsy (RE) in childhood. Data Sources A systematic review of reviews was performed, based on MEDLINE (PubMed) as at January 2021. Data Extraction The data extracted included the first author’s last name; the year of publication; the country; the study design; the population; the diagnosis, concept, and description of KD types; and major outcome. Results Twenty-one reviews were included, 8 with systematic methodology (2 of them included a meta-analysis) and 13 with unsystematic methodology. The main difference between the 2 types of reviews is the reproducibility of their methodology. Therefore, the results of each type of review were analyzed separately. Each type of review described 4 categories of KD: classic KD, modified Atkins diet (MAD), use of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), and low glycemic index treatment (LGIT). In terms of effectiveness, the considered systematic reviews reported reductions in the frequency of seizures greater than 50% in about half of the patients. Reviews without systematic methodology reported that 30%–60% of the children showed a 50% or greater reduction in seizures. The most frequently described adverse effects in the 8 systematic reviews were: vomiting (6/8), constipation (6/8), and diarrhea (6/8); and in the unsystematic reviews: vomiting and nausea (10/13), constipation (10/13), and acidosis (9/13). Conclusion KD can be an effective treatment for RE, with a more than 50% reduction in the frequency of seizures and cognitive improvement being achieved in half of the pediatric patients. The effectiveness of the various types of KD is comparable, and the KD can be adapted to the needs of the patient. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021244142.
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Collaborators (11)
María de Lourdes Samaniego-Vaesken
Associate Professor (Profesor Titular en Nutrición y Bromatología)
Universidad CEU San Pablo Facultad de Farmacia
JOSE MANUEL MORENO-VILLARES
Chief of the Department
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Teresa Partearroyo
Profesor Titular en Nutrición y Bromatología
Universidad CEU San Pablo
Emilio Martínez De Victoria Muñoz
Universidad de Granada
GREGORIO VARELA-MOREIRAS
Professor Nutrition and Food Science
Universidad CEU San Pablo
Maria Dolores Ruiz-López
Professor and Research
Universidad de Granada
Eduardo Jesús Guerra-Hernández
Universidad de Granada
TERESA VALERO GASPAR
Profesora Ayudante Doctora
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Esther Molina-Montes
Universidad de Granada
Ángel Gil
Universidad de Granada
Mercedes Gil-Campos
Professor of Pediatrics
Universidad de Córdoba
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.