Marek Domin
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (14)
Year:
2025
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the pomace drying methods (freeze-drying and convection-drying) and their percentage (0–10%) on selected physicochemical properties of gluten-free bread. The contents of nutrients (protein, fiber, fat, ash, and carbohydrates), bioactive compounds, antioxidant properties, acidity, baking efficiency, and moisture of the obtained products were determined. Fortifying the bread with raspberry pomace resulted in a change in fiber content from 18.13% d. b. (control sample) up to 19.97% d. b. (10% of freeze-dried pomace), and a change in the fat and ash content in the bread from 5.74% and 2.83% d. b. (control sample) to 7.18% and 3.12% d. b. (10% of freeze-dried pomace). The content of carbohydrates decreased after adding raspberry pomace to the bread, from 65.71% d. b. (control sample) to 63.68% d. b. (5% of freeze-dried pomace). The research carried out also showed that the introduction of 10% freeze-dried raspberry pomace increased the total polyphenol content by 81.75% and the antioxidant properties defined by the ABTS method by 159.54% and by the DPPH method by 96.43% compared to the control bread. The introduction of pomace resulted in a significant reduction in the total baking loss, from 15.1% to 10.62%, and an increase in the total titratable acidity of the crumb, from 2.13 mL NaOH/10 g d. b to 7.78 mL NaOH/10 g d. b. Principal component analysis highlighted a marked effect of the drying method and content of raspberry pomace on the quality values of gluten-free bread. This research demonstrated that raspberry pomace can be a valuable source of fiber and bioactive substances in gluten-free bread.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Cereal bars are so-called convenience foods. Consumers value these products as a healthier alternative to traditional chocolate bars. Since these snacks usually contain added dried fruit, they have high potential for the utilisation of waste materials from the fruit industry. The study aimed to determine the effect of fortification of cereal bars with grape and apple pomace on their nutritional value, physical properties, and sensory quality. The control recipe was modified by replacing 10 or 20 g of sultanas with apple or grape pomace. The fortification with these food by-products resulted in a significant increase in the moisture content of the products, an increase in soluble fibre content, and a decrease in the level of antioxidant compounds. The strength of the cereal bars supplemented with grape and apple pomace increased. In addition, the panellists noticed a colour difference compared to the unmodified product (2 < ΔE < 5). A positive effect of the addition of the fruit pomace on the visual characteristics of the cereal bars was also observed. No changes were observed in the tastiness of the product. On the other hand, the aroma of the modified products and the texture of the bars containing the apple residue were less acceptable. In conclusion, cereal bars containing grape pomace and up to 10 g of apple pomace are characterised by high soluble dietary fibre content and desirable sensory and mechanical properties and are therefore recommended for industrial production.
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (21)
Robert Rusinek
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences
Marek Gancarz
Professor (Associate)
University of Agriculture
Zbigniew Kobus
prof. UP
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Waldemar Wołyński
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Arkadiusz Matwijczuk
Lecturer
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Ryszard AMAROWICZ
Professor
Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences / Instytut Rozrodu Zwierząt i Badań Żywno
Magdalena Kachel
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Monika Krzywicka
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Magdalena Ćwiklińska
University of Life Sciences
Michał JANIAK
Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences / Instytut Rozrodu Zwierząt i Badań Żywno
Andrzej Krzykowski
University of Life Sciences
Ryszard Kulig
associate professor
University of Life Sciences
Dariusz Siłuch
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Sybilla Nazarewicz
University of Life Sciences
Agnieszka Sagan
University of Life Sciences
Łukasz Smaga
Adam Mickiewicz University
Grzegorz Łysiak
prof. uczelni/dr hab. inż.
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
Rafał Nadulski
Professor
University of Life Sciences
Renata Różyło
University profesor
University of Life Sciences
Leszek Rydzak
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Agata Blicharz-Kania
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.